EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edoardo Romiti
dblp:304/5282
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5983-7089ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 70% Motion planning and robot control · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › modular robot
modular reconfigurable robots |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Minimum-Effort Task-based Design Optimization of Modular Reconfigurable Robots · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Minimum-Effort Task-based Design Optimization of Modular Reconfigurable Robots · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
multi-arm manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Minimum-Effort Task-based Design Optimization of Modular Reconfigurable Robots · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relative jacobian · 0.5minimum-effort optimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Task-Driven Computational Framework for Simultaneously Optimizing Design and Mounted Pose of Modular Reconfigurable ManipulatorsabstractModular reconfigurable manipulators enable quick adaptation and versatility to address different application environments and tailor to the specific requirements of the tasks. Task performance significantly depends on the manipulator’s mounted pose and morphology design, therefore posing the need of methodologies for selecting suitable modular robot configurations and mounted pose that can address the specific task requirements and required performance. Morphological changes in modular robots can be derived through a discrete optimization process that involves the selective addition or removal of modules. In contrast, the adjustment of the mounted pose operates within a continuous space, allowing for smooth and precise alterations in both orientation and position. This work introduces a computational framework that simultaneously optimizes the pose and morphology mounted on modular manipulators. The core of the work is that we design a mapping function that implicitly captures the morphological state of manipulators in the continuous space. This transformation function unifies the optimization of mounted pose and morphology within a continuous space. Furthermore, our optimization framework incorporates a array of performance metrics, such as minimum joint effort and maximum manipulability, and considerations for trajectory execution error and physical and collision constraints. To highlight our method’s benefits, we compare it with previous methods that framed such problems as a combinatorial optimization problem and demonstrate its practicality in selecting the modular robot configuration for executing a drilling task with the CONCERT modular robotic platform. Maolin Lei, Edoardo Romiti, Arturo Laurenzi, Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis |
IROS | 2 |
| 2021 | Minimum-Effort Task-based Design Optimization of Modular Reconfigurable RobotsabstractThe flexibility and adaptability of modular and re-configurable robots opens up new opportunities for on-demand robot morphology optimization for varying tasks. In particular, multi-arm robotic systems can expand the solution space for any given task. In this paper, we present a novel approach to exploit this feature for generating optimal fit-to-task robot structures with respect to a minimum-effort objective. By describing the task in terms of relative poses between the end-effector and the constraint frame, and making use of the relative Jacobian, the minimum effort optimization problem can be equally expressed for single-arm or multi-arm robots. We test our approach for a peg-in-hole and a contour-following task and compare the performance of the optimal solution obtained with that of a standard manipulator configuration. Edoardo Romiti, Navvab Kashiri, Jörn Malzahn, Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis |
ICRA | 1 |