Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Atharv Sonwane

dblp:304/5322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0000-2132-0458ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 33% Vision and language · 29% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 29%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
task and motion planning
0.712023
Policy-Guided Lazy Search with Feedback for Task and Motion Planning · ICRA 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge incorporation › knowledge-infused learning › neuro-symbolic learning
neural algorithmic reasoning
0.612022
Solving Visual Analogies Using Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual analogical reasoning
0.612022
Solving Visual Analogies Using Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Program synthesis and code generation
neural program synthesis
0.612022
Solving Visual Analogies Using Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic search · 1.1neural network transformation · 1.1learned policy guidance · 0.7lazy search · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Policy-Guided Lazy Search with Feedback for Task and Motion Planning
abstract
PDDLStream solvers have recently emerged as viable solutions for Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) problems, extending PDDL to problems with continuous action spaces. Prior work has shown how PDDLStream problems can be reduced to a sequence of PDDL planning problems, which can then be solved using off-the-shelf planners. However, this approach can suffer from long runtimes. In this paper we propose LAZY, a solver for PDDLStream problems that maintains a single integrated search over action skeletons, which gets progressively more geometrically informed, as samples of possible motions are lazily drawn during motion planning. We explore how learned models of goal-directed policies and current motion sampling data can be incorporated in LAZY to adaptively guide the task planner. We show that this leads to significant speed-ups in the search for a feasible solution evaluated over unseen test environments of varying numbers of objects, goals, and initial conditions. We evaluate our TAMP approach by comparing to existing solvers for PDDLStream problems on a range of simulated 7DoF rearrangement/manipulation problems. Code can be found at https://rvl.cs.toronto.edu/learning-based-tamp.
Mohamed Khodeir, Atharv Sonwane, Ruthrash Hari, Florian Shkurti
ICRA2
2022 Solving Visual Analogies Using Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (Student Abstract)
abstract
We consider a class of visual analogical reasoning problems that involve discovering the sequence of transformations by which pairs of input/output images are related, so as to analogously transform future inputs. This program synthesis task can be easily solved via symbolic search. Using a variation of the ‘neural analogical reasoning’ approach, we instead search for a sequence of elementary neural network transformations that manipulate distributed representations derived from a symbolic space, to which input images are directly encoded. We evaluate the extent to which our ‘neural reasoning’ approach generalises for images with unseen shapes and positions.
Atharv Sonwane, Gautam Shroff, Lovekesh Vig, Ashwin Srinivasan 0001, Tirtharaj Dash
AAAI1