Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas Alonso

dblp:304/7486 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Learning theory · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning
0.812024
Understanding and Improving Optimization in Predictive Coding Networks · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › optimizer design
memory-efficient optimizer
0.812024
Understanding and Improving Optimization in Predictive Coding Networks · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
predictive coding networks
0.812024
Understanding and Improving Optimization in Predictive Coding Networks · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inference learning · 0.8backpropagation · 0.8adaptive optimizer · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Understanding and Improving Optimization in Predictive Coding Networks
abstract
Backpropagation (BP), the standard learning algorithm for artificial neural networks, is often considered biologically implausible. In contrast, the standard learning algorithm for predictive coding (PC) models in neuroscience, known as the inference learning algorithm (IL), is a promising, bio-plausible alternative. However, several challenges and questions hinder IL's application to real-world problems. For example, IL is computationally demanding, and without memory-intensive optimizers like Adam, IL may converge to poor local minima. Moreover, although IL can reduce loss more quickly than BP, the reasons for these speedups or their robustness remains unclear. In this paper, we tackle these challenges by 1) altering the standard implementation of PC circuits to substantially reduce computation, 2) developing a novel optimizer that improves the convergence of IL without increasing memory usage, and 3) establishing theoretical results that help elucidate the conditions under which IL is sensitive to second and higher-order information.
Nicholas Alonso, Jeffrey L. Krichmar, Emre Neftci
AAAI1