Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elham E Khoda
dblp:304/7542
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8720-6615ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › confidence estimation
confidence interval estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
density ratio estimation · 1.7contrastive normalizing flows · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Computing Science Education on the AI Innovation LandscapeabstractRecent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including the widespread adoption of foundational models, have triggered changes across Computing Science (CS) programs. Developments include, but are not limited to, revisions to assessment practices, updates to academic integrity policies, curriculum redesign to integrate emerging concepts, and the growing use of conversational agents to support instruction. These developments aim to address effective preparation of graduates for an evolving AI innovation landscape. Ouldooz Baghban Karimi, Rebecca Robinson, Trevor Bonjour, Hannan Azhar, Mai Dahshan, Anuja T. Dharmarathne, Palak Halvadia, Elham E Khoda, Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Syed Waqar Nabi, Andrea Salgian, Cigdem Sengul, Raja Sooriamurthi |
ITiCSE (2) | 8 |
| 2026 | wa-hls4ml: A Benchmark and Surrogate Models for hls4ml Resource and Latency EstimationabstractAs machine learning (ML) is increasingly implemented in hardware to address real-time challenges in scientific applications, the development of advanced toolchains has significantly reduced the time required to iterate on various designs. These advancements have solved major obstacles, but also exposed new challenges. For example, processes that were not previously considered bottlenecks, such as hardware synthesis, are becoming limiting factors in the rapid iteration of designs. To mitigate these emerging constraints, multipleefforts have been undertaken to develop an ML-based surrogate model that estimates resource usage of synthesized ML accelerator architectures. We introduce wa-hls4ml, a benchmark for ML accelerator resource and latency estimation, and its corresponding initial dataset of over 680 000 fully connected and convolutional neural networks, all synthesized using hls4ml and targeting Xilinx FPGAs. The benchmark evaluates the performance of resource and latency predictors against several common ML model architectures, primarily originating from scientific domains, as exemplar models, and the average performance across a subset of the dataset. Additionally, we introduce GNN- and transformer-based surrogate models that predict latency and resources for ML accelerators. We present the architecture and performance of the models and find that the models generally predict latency and resources for the 75% percentile within several percent of the synthesized resources on the synthetic test dataset. Benjamin Hawks, Jason Weitz, Dmitri Demler, Karla Tame-Narvaez, Dennis Plotnikov, Mohammad Mehdi Rahimifar, Hamza Ezzaoui Rahali, Audrey C. Therrien, Donovan Sproule, Elham E Khoda, Keegan A. Smith, Russell Marroquin, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo, Javier M. Duarte, Vladimir Loncar |
ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. | 10 |
| 2026 | hls4ml: A Flexible, Open Source Platform for Deep Learning Acceleration on Reconfigurable HardwareabstractWe present hls4ml , a free and open source platform that translates machine learning (ML) models from modern deep learning frameworks into high-level synthesis (HLS) code that can be integrated into full designs for field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). With its flexible and modular design, hls4ml supports a large number of deep learning frameworks and can target HLS compilers from several vendors, including Vitis HLS, Intel oneAPI and Catapult HLS. Together with a wider eco-system for software-hardware co-design, hls4ml has enabled the acceleration of ML inference in a wide range of commercial and scientific applications where low latency, resource usage, and power consumption are critical. In this article, we describe the structure and functionality of the hls4ml platform. The overarching design considerations for the generated HLS code are discussed, together with selected performance results. Jan-Frederik Schulte, Benjamin Ramhorst, Jovan Mitrevski, Nicolò Ghielmetti, Enrico Lupi, Dimitrios Danopoulos, Vladimir Loncar, Javier M. Duarte, David Burnette, Lauri Laatu, Stylianos Tzelepis, Konstantinos Axiotis, Quentin Berthet, Haoyan Wang, Suleyman Demirsoy, Marco Colombo, Thea Aarrestad, Sioni Summers, Maurizio Pierini, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo, Jennifer Ngadiuba, Javier Campos, Benjamin Hawks, Abhijith Gandrakota, Farah Fahim, George A. Constantinides, Zhiqiang Que, Wayne Luk, Alexander D. Tapper, Duc Hoang, Noah Paladino, Philip C. Harris, Bo-Cheng Lai, Manuel Valentin, Ryan Forelli, Seda Ogrenci Memik, Lino Gerlach, Rian Brooks Flynn, Mia Liu, Daniel Diaz 0003, Elham E Khoda, Melissa Quinnan, Russell Solares, Santosh Parajuli, Mark S. Neubauer, Christian Herwig, Ho Fung Tsoi, Dylan S. Rankin, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Scott Hauck |
ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. | 44 |
| 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and CompetitionabstractThe FAIR Universe – HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge focused on measuring the physical properties of elementary particles with imperfect simulators. Participants were required to compute and report confidence intervals for a parameter of interest regarding the Higgs boson while accounting for various systematic (epistemic) uncertainties. The dataset is a tabular dataset of 28 features and 280 million instances. Each instance represents a simulated proton-proton collision as observed at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland. The features of these simulations were chosen to capture key characteristics of different types of particles. These include primary attributes, such as the energy and three-dimensional momentum of the particles, as well as derived attributes, which are calculated from the primary ones using domain-specific knowledge. Additionally, a label feature designates each instance’s type of proton-proton collision, distinguishing the Higgs boson events of interest from three background sources. As outlined in this paper, the permanent dataset release allows long-term benchmarking of new techniques. The leading submissions, including Contrastive Normalising Flows and Density Ratios estimation through classification, are described. Our challenge has brought together the physics and machine learning communities to advance our understanding and methodologies in handling systematic uncertainties within AI techniques. Wahid Bhimji, Ragansu Chakkappai, Po-Wen Chang, Yuan-Tang Chou, Sascha Diefenbacher, Jordan Dudley, Ibrahim Elsharkawy, Steven Farrell, Aishik Ghosh, Cristina Giordano, Isabelle Guyon, Christopher J. Harris 0004, Yota Hashizume, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Elham E Khoda, Claudius Krause, Benjamin Nachman, David Rousseau, Robert Schöfbeck, Maryam Shooshtari, Dennis Schwarz, Daohan Wang |
NeurIPS | 15 |