Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hunter M. Ray

dblp:304/8034 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 53% Robot navigation and mapping · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 9%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
target search
1.022024
Human-Centered Autonomy for UAS Target Search · ICRA 2024
HARPS: An Online POMDP Framework for Human-Assisted Robotic Planning and Sensing · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
POMDP planning
0.712023
HARPS: An Online POMDP Framework for Human-Assisted Robotic Planning and Sensing · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
sequential decision making under uncertainty
0.712023
HARPS: An Online POMDP Framework for Human-Assisted Robotic Planning and Sensing · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning
0.212024
Human-Centered Autonomy for UAS Target Search · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic fusion · 1.5POMDP · 1.5sampling-based planning · 1.3multimodal interaction · 1.3bayesian data fusion · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Human-Centered Autonomy for UAS Target Search
abstract
Current methods of deploying robots that operate in dynamic, uncertain environments, such as Uncrewed Aerial Systems in search & rescue missions, require nearly continuous human supervision for vehicle guidance and operation. These methods do not consider high-level mission context resulting in cumbersome manual operation or inefficient exhaustive search patterns. We present a human-centered autonomous frame-work that infers geospatial mission context through dynamic feature sets, which then guides a probabilistic target search planner. Operators provide a set of diverse inputs, including priority definition, spatial semantic information about ad-hoc geographical areas, and reference waypoints, which are probabilistically fused with geographical database information and condensed into a geospatial distribution representing an operator’s preferences over an area. An online, POMDP-based planner, optimized for target searching, is augmented with this reward map to generate an operator-constrained policy. Our results, simulated based on input from five professional rescuers, display effective task mental model alignment, 18% more victim finds, and 15 times more efficient guidance plans then current operational methods.
Hunter M. Ray, Zakariya Laouar, Zachary Sunberg, Nisar R. Ahmed
ICRA1
2023 HARPS: An Online POMDP Framework for Human-Assisted Robotic Planning and Sensing
abstract
The ability of autonomous robots to model, communicate, and act on semantic “soft data” remains challenging. The human-assisted robotic planning and sensing (HARPS) framework is presented for active semantic sensing and planning in human–robot teams to address these gaps by formally combining the benefits of online sampling-based partially observable Markov decision process policies, multimodal human–robot interaction, and Bayesian data fusion. HARPS lets humans impose model structure and extend the range of soft data by sketching and labeling new semantic features in uncertain environments. Dynamic model updating lets robotic agents actively query humans for novel and relevant semantic data, thereby improving model and state beliefs for improved online planning. Simulations of a unmanned aerial vehicle-enabled target search in a large-scale partially structured environment show significant improvements in time and beliefs required for interception versus conventional planning with robot-only sensing. A human subject study in the same environment shows an average doubling in dynamic target capture rate compared to the lone robot case and highlights the robustness of HARPS over a range of user characteristics and interaction modalities.
Luke Burks, Hunter M. Ray, Jamison McGinley, Sousheel Vunnam, Nisar R. Ahmed
IEEE Trans. Robotics2