Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akarsh Potta
dblp:304/8093 · also Akarsh Nayan Potta
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
neural program synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scaling Neural Program Synthesis with Distribution-Based Search · AAAI 2022 |
Program synthesis and code generation
programming by example |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scaling Neural Program Synthesis with Distribution-Based Search · AAAI 2022 |
Program synthesis and code generation
search-based program synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scaling Neural Program Synthesis with Distribution-Based Search · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic sampling · 0.6parallel search · 0.6enumerative search · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Scaling Neural Program Synthesis with Distribution-Based SearchabstractWe consider the problem of automatically constructing computer programs from input-output examples. We investigate how to augment probabilistic and neural program synthesis methods with new search algorithms, proposing a framework called distribution-based search. Within this framework, we introduce two new search algorithms: Heap Search, an enumerative method, and SQRT Sampling, a probabilistic method. We prove certain optimality guarantees for both methods, show how they integrate with probabilistic and neural techniques, and demonstrate how they can operate at scale across parallel compute environments. Collectively these findings offer theoretical and applied studies of search algorithms for program synthesis that integrate with recent developments in machine-learned program synthesizers. Nathanaël Fijalkow, Guillaume Lagarde, Théo Matricon, Kevin Ellis, Pierre Ohlmann, Akarsh Potta |
AAAI | 6 |