EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph Pemberton
dblp:304/8878
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 60% Reinforcement learning · 40% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Single-phase deep learning in cortico-cortical networks · NeurIPS 2022 Cortico-cerebellar networks as decoupling neural interfaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Single-phase deep learning in cortico-cortical networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Single-phase deep learning in cortico-cortical networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
decoupled neural interfaces |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Cortico-cerebellar networks as decoupling neural interfaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Cortico-cerebellar networks as decoupling neural interfaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 1.0decoupled neural interface · 1.0short-term plasticity · 0.6dendrite-targeting interneurons · 0.6bursting activity · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Single-phase deep learning in cortico-cortical networksabstractThe error-backpropagation (backprop) algorithm remains the most common solution to the credit assignment problem in artificial neural networks. In neuroscience, it is unclear whether the brain could adopt a similar strategy to correctly modify its synapses. Recent models have attempted to bridge this gap while being consistent with a range of experimental observations. However, these models are either unable to effectively backpropagate error signals across multiple layers or require a multi-phase learning process, neither of which are reminiscent of learning in the brain. Here, we introduce a new model, Bursting Cortico-Cortical Networks (BurstCCN), which solves these issues by integrating known properties of cortical networks namely bursting activity, short-term plasticity (STP) and dendrite-targeting interneurons. BurstCCN relies on burst multiplexing via connection-type-specific STP to propagate backprop-like error signals within deep cortical networks. These error signals are encoded at distal dendrites and induce burst-dependent plasticity as a result of excitatory-inhibitory top-down inputs. First, we demonstrate that our model can effectively backpropagate errors through multiple layers using a single-phase learning process. Next, we show both empirically and analytically that learning in our model approximates backprop-derived gradients. Finally, we demonstrate that our model is capable of learning complex image classification tasks (MNIST and CIFAR-10). Overall, our results suggest that cortical features across sub-cellular, cellular, microcircuit and systems levels jointly underlie single-phase efficient deep learning in the brain. Will Greedy, Heng Wei Zhu, Joseph Pemberton, Jack Mellor, Rui Ponte Costa |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Cortico-cerebellar networks as decoupling neural interfacesabstractThe brain solves the credit assignment problem remarkably well. For credit to be assigned across neural networks they must, in principle, wait for specific neural computations to finish. How the brain deals with this inherent locking problem has remained unclear. Deep learning methods suffer from similar locking constraints both on the forward and feedback phase. Recently, decoupled neural interfaces (DNIs) were introduced as a solution to the forward and feedback locking problems in deep networks.Here we propose that a specialised brain region, the cerebellum, helps the cerebral cortex solve similar locking problems akin to DNIs. To demonstrate the potential of this framework we introduce a systems-level model in which a recurrent cortical network receives online temporal feedback predictions from a cerebellar module. We test this cortico-cerebellar recurrent neural network (ccRNN) model on a number of sensorimotor (line and digit drawing) and cognitive tasks (pattern recognition and caption generation) that have been shown to be cerebellar-dependent. In all tasks, we observe that ccRNNs facilitates learning while reducing ataxia-like behaviours, consistent with classical experimental observations. Moreover, our model also explains recent behavioural and neuronal observations while making several testable predictions across multiple levels.Overall, our work offers a novel perspective on the cerebellum as a brain-wide decoupling machine for efficient credit assignment and opens a new avenue between deep learning and neuroscience. Joseph Pemberton, Ellen Boven, Richard Apps, Rui Ponte Costa |
NeurIPS | 1 |