Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rubing Yang

dblp:304/8991 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-0886-3787ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 43% Learning theory · 25% Language models and text generation · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 77% Energy-efficient computing · 23%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › token reduction
adaptive token pruning
1.012026
SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
KV cache management
1.012026
SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
LLM inference optimization
1.012026
SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
long-context inference
1.012026
SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning · AAAI 2026
Memory systems
in-memory computing
1.012026
CIMinus: Empowering Sparse DNN Workloads Modeling and Exploration on SRAM-Based CIM Architectures · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.812024
Prospective Learning: Learning for a Dynamic Future · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
task similarity
0.712023
A Picture of the Space of Typical Learnable Tasks · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.612022
Does the Data Induce Capacity Control in Deep Learning? · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis
0.612022
Does the Data Induce Capacity Control in Deep Learning? · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
attention computation
0.312026
SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning · AAAI 2026
Energy-efficient computing › power-performance modeling
energy-delay modeling
0.312026
CIMinus: Empowering Sparse DNN Workloads Modeling and Exploration on SRAM-Based CIM Architectures · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hessian analysis
0.212022
Does the Data Induce Capacity Control in Deep Learning? · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic token pruning · 1.0cost modeling · 1.0asynchronous KV cache prefetching · 1.0empirical risk minimization · 0.8meta-learning · 0.7information geometry · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7fisher information matrix · 0.6eigenspectrum analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SlimInfer: Accelerating Long-Context LLM Inference via Dynamic Token Pruning
abstract
Long-context inference for Large Language Models (LLMs) is heavily limited by high computational demands. While several existing methods optimize attention computation, they still process the full set of hidden states at each layer, limiting overall efficiency. In this work, we propose SlimInfer, an innovative framework that aims to accelerate inference by directly pruning less critical prompt tokens during the forward pass. Our key insight is an information diffusion phenomenon: As information from critical tokens propagates through layers, it becomes distributed across the entire sequence. This diffusion process suggests that LLMs can maintain their semantic integrity when excessive tokens, even including these critical ones, are pruned in hidden states. Motivated by this, SlimInfer introduces a dynamic fine-grained pruning mechanism that accurately removes redundant tokens of hidden state at intermediate layers. This layer-wise pruning naturally enables an asynchronous KV cache manager that prefetches required token blocks without complex predictors, reducing both memory usage and I/O costs. Extensive experiments show that SlimInfer can achieve up to 2.53× time-to-first-token (TTFT) speedup and 1.88× end-to-end latency reduction for LLaMA3.1-8B-Instruct on a single RTX 4090, without sacrificing performance on LongBench.
Lingkun Long, Rubing Yang, Yushi Huang, Desheng Hui, Jianlei Yang 0001
AAAI2
2026 CIMinus: Empowering Sparse DNN Workloads Modeling and Exploration on SRAM-Based CIM Architectures
abstract
Compute-in-memory (CIM) has emerged as a pivotal direction for accelerating workloads in the field of machine learning, such as Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, the effectively exploitation of sparsity in CIM systems presents numerous challenges, due to the inherent limitations in their rigid array structures. Designing sparse DNN dataflows and developing efficient mapping strategies also become more complex when accounting for diverse sparsity patterns and the flexibility of a multi-macro CIM structure. Despite these complexities, there is still an absence of a unified systematic view and modeling approach for diverse sparse DNN workloads in CIM systems. In this paper, we propose CIMinus, a framework dedicated to cost modeling for sparse DNN workloads on CIM architectures. It provides an in-depth energy consumption analysis at the level of individual components and an assessment of the overall workload latency. We validate CIMinus against contemporary CIM architectures and demonstrate its applicability in two use-cases. These cases provide valuable insights into both the impact of sparsity patterns and the effectiveness of mapping strategies, bridging the gap between theoretical design and practical implementation.
Yingjie Qi, Jianlei Yang 0001, Rubing Yang, Cenlin Duan, Xiaolin He, Ziyan He, Weitao Pan, Weisheng Zhao 0001
IEEE Trans. Computers3
2024 Prospective Learning: Learning for a Dynamic Future
abstract
In real-world applications, the distribution of the data, and our goals, evolve over time. The prevailing theoretical framework for studying machine learning, namely probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, largely ignores time. As a consequence, existing strategies to address the dynamic nature of data and goals exhibit poor real-world performance. This paper develops a theoretical framework called "Prospective Learning" that is tailored for situations when the optimal hypothesis changes over time. In PAC learning, empirical risk minimization (ERM) is known to be consistent. We develop a learner called Prospective ERM, which returns a sequence of predictors that make predictions on future data. We prove that the risk of prospective ERM converges to the Bayes risk under certain assumptions on the stochastic process generating the data. Prospective ERM, roughly speaking, incorporates time as an input in addition to the data. We show that standard ERM as done in PAC learning, without incorporating time, can result in failure to learn when distributions are dynamic. Numerical experiments illustrate that prospective ERM can learn synthetic and visual recognition problems constructed from MNIST and CIFAR-10. Code at https://github.com/neurodata/prolearn.
Ashwin De Silva, Rahul Ramesh, Rubing Yang, Siyu Yu, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Pratik Chaudhari
NeurIPS3
2023 A Picture of the Space of Typical Learnable Tasks
abstract
We develop information geometric techniques to understand the representations learned by deep networks when they are trained on different tasks using supervised, meta-, semi-supervised and contrastive learning. We shed light on the following phenomena that relate to the structure of the space of tasks: (1) the manifold of probabilistic models trained on different tasks using different representation learning methods is effectively low-dimensional; (2) supervised learning on one task results in a surprising amount of progress even on seemingly dissimilar tasks; progress on other tasks is larger if the training task has diverse classes; (3) the structure of the space of tasks indicated by our analysis is consistent with parts of the Wordnet phylogenetic tree; (4) episodic meta-learning algorithms and supervised learning traverse different trajectories during training but they fit similar models eventually; (5) contrastive and semi-supervised learning methods traverse trajectories similar to those of supervised learning. We use classification tasks constructed from the CIFAR-10 and Imagenet datasets to study these phenomena. Code is available at https://github.com/grasp-lyrl/picture_of_space_of_tasks.
Rahul Ramesh, Jialin Mao, Itay Griniasty, Rubing Yang, Han Kheng Teoh, Mark K. Transtrum, James P. Sethna, Pratik Chaudhari
ICML4
2022 Does the Data Induce Capacity Control in Deep Learning?
abstract
We show that the input correlation matrix of typical classification datasets has an eigenspectrum where, after a sharp initial drop, a large number of small eigenvalues are distributed uniformly over an exponentially large range. This structure is mirrored in a network trained on this data: we show that the Hessian and the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) have eigenvalues that are spread uniformly over exponentially large ranges. We call such eigenspectra “sloppy” because sets of weights corresponding to small eigenvalues can be changed by large magnitudes without affecting the loss. Networks trained on atypical datasets with non-sloppy inputs do not share these traits and deep networks trained on such datasets generalize poorly. Inspired by this, we study the hypothesis that sloppiness of inputs aids generalization in deep networks. We show that if the Hessian is sloppy, we can compute non-vacuous PAC-Bayes generalization bounds analytically. By exploiting our empirical observation that training predominantly takes place in the non-sloppy subspace of the FIM, we develop data-distribution dependent PAC-Bayes priors that lead to accurate generalization bounds using numerical optimization.
Rubing Yang, Jialin Mao, Pratik Chaudhari
ICML1