Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ido Galil
dblp:304/9000
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Hierarchical Selective Classification · NeurIPS 2024 What Can we Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifiers? · ICLR 2023 Disrupting Deep Uncertainty Estimation Without Harming Accuracy · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Hierarchical Selective Classification · NeurIPS 2024 What Can we Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifiers? · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A framework for benchmarking Class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A framework for benchmarking Class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet · ICLR 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disrupting Deep Uncertainty Estimation Without Harming Accuracy · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | Hierarchical Selective Classification · NeurIPS 2024 What Can we Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifiers? · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A framework for benchmarking Class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
white-box attack · 1.0perturbation · 1.0black-box attack · 1.0parallelization · 0.9mixed integer programming · 0.9feed-forward network fusion · 0.9blockwise local knowledge distillation · 0.9risk-coverage analysis · 0.8knowledge distillation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) offer remarkable capabilities, yet their high inference costs restrict wider adoption.
While increasing parameter counts improves accuracy, it also broadens the gap between state-of-the-art capabilities and practical deployability. We present **Puzzle**, a hardware-aware framework that accelerates the inference of LLMs while preserving their capabilities.
Using neural architecture search (NAS) at a large-scale, Puzzle optimizes models with tens of billions of parameters.
Our approach utilizes blockwise local knowledge distillation (BLD) for parallel architecture exploration and employs mixed-integer programming for precise constraint optimization.
We showcase our framework’s impact via Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B-Instruct (Nemotron-51B) and Llama-3.3-Nemotron-49B, two publicly available models derived from Llama-70B-Instruct. Both models achieve a 2.17x inference throughput speedup, fitting on a single NVIDIA H100 GPU while retaining 98.4% of the original model's benchmark accuracies.
These are the most accurate models supporting single H100 GPU inference with large batch sizes, despite training on 45B tokens at most, far fewer than the 15T used to train Llama-70B.
Lastly, we show that lightweight alignment on these derived models allows them to surpass the parent model in specific capabilities.
Our work establishes that powerful LLM models can be optimized for efficient deployment with only negligible loss in quality, underscoring that inference performance, not parameter count alone, should guide model selection. Akhiad Bercovich, Tomer Ronen, Talor Abramovich, Nir Ailon, Nave Assaf, Mohammad Dabbah, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izhak Golan, Netanel Haber, Ehud Karpas, Roi Koren, Itay Levy, Pavlo Molchanov 0001, Shahar Mor, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Omri Puny, Ran Rubin, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Omer Ullman Argov, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICML | 7 |
| 2025 | Padding Tone: A Mechanistic Analysis of Padding Tokens in T2I ModelsabstractMichael Toker, Ido Galil, Hadas Orgad, Rinon Gal, Yoad Tewel, Gal Chechik, Yonatan Belinkov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Michael Toker, Ido Galil, Hadas Orgad, Rinon Gal, Yoad Tewel, Gal Chechik, Yonatan Belinkov |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language ModelsabstractWe introduce \textit{FFN Fusion}, an architectural optimization technique that reduces sequential computation in large language models by identifying and exploiting natural opportunities for parallelization. Our key insight is that sequences of Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers, particularly those remaining after the removal of specific attention layers, can often be parallelized with minimal accuracy impact. We develop a principled methodology for identifying and fusing such sequences, transforming them into parallel operations that significantly reduce inference latency while preserving model behavior. Applying these techniques to Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, we create a 253B model (253B-Base), an efficient and soon-to-be publicly available model that achieves a 1.71$\times$ speedup in inference latency and 35$\times$ lower per-token cost while maintaining strong performance across benchmarks. Most intriguingly, we find that even full transformer blocks containing both attention and FFN layers can sometimes be parallelized, suggesting new directions for neural architecture design. Akhiad Bercovich, Mohammad Dabbah, Omri Puny, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izik Golan, Ehud Karpas, Itay Levy, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Tomer Ronen, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Hierarchical Selective ClassificationabstractDeploying deep neural networks for risk-sensitive tasks necessitates an uncertainty estimation mechanism. This paper introduces *hierarchical selective classification*, extending selective classification to a hierarchical setting. Our approach leverages the inherent structure of class relationships, enabling models to reduce the specificity of their predictions when faced with uncertainty. In this paper, we first formalize hierarchical risk and coverage, and introduce hierarchical risk-coverage curves. Next, we develop algorithms for hierarchical selective classification (which we refer to as "inference rules"), and propose an efficient algorithm that guarantees a target accuracy constraint with high probability. Lastly, we conduct extensive empirical studies on over a thousand ImageNet classifiers, revealing that training regimes such as CLIP, pretraining on ImageNet21k and knowledge distillation boost hierarchical selective performance. Shani Goren, Ido Galil, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | A framework for benchmarking Class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet
Ido Galil, Mohammed Dabbah, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | What Can we Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifiers?
Ido Galil, Mohammed Dabbah, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Disrupting Deep Uncertainty Estimation Without Harming AccuracyabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) have proven to be powerful predictors and are widely used for various tasks. Credible uncertainty estimation of their predictions, however, is crucial for their deployment in many risk-sensitive applications. In this paper we present a novel and simple attack, which unlike adversarial attacks, does not cause incorrect predictions but instead cripples the network's capacity for uncertainty estimation. The result is that after the attack, the DNN is more confident of its incorrect predictions than about its correct ones without having its accuracy reduced. We present two versions of the attack. The first scenario focuses on a black-box regime (where the attacker has no knowledge of the target network) and the second scenario attacks a white-box setting. The proposed attack is only required to be of minuscule magnitude for its perturbations to cause severe uncertainty estimation damage, with larger magnitudes resulting in completely unusable uncertainty estimations.We demonstrate successful attacks on three of the most popular uncertainty estimation methods: the vanilla softmax score, Deep Ensembles and MC-Dropout. Additionally, we show an attack on SelectiveNet, the selective classification architecture. We test the proposed attack on several contemporary architectures such as MobileNetV2 and EfficientNetB0, all trained to classify ImageNet. Ido Galil, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 1 |