Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denis Rakitin

dblp:305/0088 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 83% Optimization for machine learning · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
gumbel-max trick
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent structure discovery
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation
0.112021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient estimation
score function estimator
0.112021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score function estimator · 0.5gumbel-max trick · 0.5control variates · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Differentiable Rendering with Reparameterized Volume Sampling
abstract
In view synthesis, a neural radiance field approximates underlying density and radiance fields based on a sparse set of scene pictures. To generate a pixel of a novel view, it marches a ray through the pixel and computes a weighted sum of radiance emitted from a dense set of ray points. This rendering algorithm is fully differentiable and facilitates gradient-based optimization of the fields. However, in practice, only a tiny opaque portion of the ray contributes most of the radiance to the sum. We propose a simple end-to-end differentiable sampling algorithm based on inverse transform sampling. It generates samples according to the probability distribution induced by the density field and picks non-transparent points on the ray. We utilize the algorithm in two ways. First, we propose a novel rendering approach based on Monte Carlo estimates. This approach allows for evaluating and optimizing a neural radiance field with just a few radiance field calls per ray. Second, we use the sampling algorithm to modify the hierarchical scheme proposed in the original NeRF work. We show that our modification improves reconstruction quality of hierarchical models, at the same time simplifying the training procedure by removing the need for auxiliary proposal network losses.
Nikita Morozov, Denis Rakitin, Oleg Desheulin, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Kirill Struminsky
AISTATS2
2021 Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces
abstract
Structured latent variables allow incorporating meaningful prior knowledge into deep learning models. However, learning with such variables remains challenging because of their discrete nature. Nowadays, the standard learning approach is to define a latent variable as a perturbed algorithm output and to use a differentiable surrogate for training. In general, the surrogate puts additional constraints on the model and inevitably leads to biased gradients. To alleviate these shortcomings, we extend the Gumbel-Max trick to define distributions over structured domains. We avoid the differentiable surrogates by leveraging the score function estimators for optimization. In particular, we highlight a family of recursive algorithms with a common feature we call stochastic invariant. The feature allows us to construct reliable gradient estimates and control variates without additional constraints on the model. In our experiments, we consider various structured latent variable models and achieve results competitive with relaxation-based counterparts.
Kirill Struminsky, Artyom Gadetsky, Denis Rakitin, Danil Karpushkin, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS3