Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shreyas Kadekodi

dblp:305/0434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › social choice
preference aggregation
0.912025
Selective Preference Aggregation · ICML 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
rank aggregation
0.912025
Selective Preference Aggregation · ICML 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
social choice
0.912025
Selective Preference Aggregation · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective ranking · 1.7partial order aggregation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Selective Preference Aggregation
abstract
Many applications in machine learning and decision-making rely on procedures to aggregate human preferences. In such tasks, individual express ordinal preferences over a set of items through votes, ratings, or pairwise comparisons. We then summarize their collective preferences as a ranking. Standard methods for preference aggregation are designed to return rankings that arbitrate individual disagreements in ways that are faithful and fair. In this work, we introduce a paradigm for *selective aggregation*, where we can avoid the need to arbitrate dissent by abstaining from comparison. We summarize collective preferences as a *selective ranking* -- i.e., a partial order where we can only compare items where at least $100\cdot(1 - \tau)\%$ of individuals agree. We develop algorithms to build selective rankings that achieve all possible trade-offs between comparability and disagreement, and derive formal guarantees on their safety and stability. We conduct an extensive set of experiments on real-world datasets to benchmark our approach and demonstrate its functionality. Our results show selective aggregation can promote transparency and robustness by revealing disagreement and abstaining from arbitration.
Shreyas Kadekodi, Hayden McTavish, Berk Ustun
ICML1
2023 CAT-RRT: Motion Planning that Admits Contact One Link at a Time
abstract
Current motion planning approaches rely on binary collision checking to evaluate the validity of a state and thereby dictate where the robot is allowed to move. This approach leaves little room for robots to engage in contact with an object, as is often necessary when operating in densely cluttered spaces. In this work, we propose an alternative method that considers contact states as high-cost states that the robot should avoid but can traverse if necessary to complete a task. More specifically, we introduce Contact Admissible Transition-based Rapidly exploring Random Trees (CAT-RRT)11Supplementary video and open source code [1]., a planner that uses a novel per-link cost heuristic to find a path by traversing high-cost obstacle regions. Through extensive testing, we find that state-of-the-art optimization planners tend to over-explore low-cost states, which leads to slow and inefficient convergence to contact regions. Conversely, CAT-RRT searches both low and high-cost regions simultaneously with an adaptive thresholding mechanism carried out at each robot link. This leads to paths with a balance between efficiency, path length, and contact cost.
Nataliya Nechyporenko, Caleb Escobedo, Shreyas Kadekodi, Alessandro Roncone
IROS3
2022 A Framework for the Systematic Evaluation of Obstacle Avoidance and Object-Aware Controllers
abstract
Real-time control is an essential aspect of safe robot operation in the real world with dynamic objects. We present a framework for the analysis of object-aware con-trollers, methods for altering a robot's motion to anticipate and avoid possible collisions. This framework is focused on three design considerations: kinematics, motion profiles, and virtual constraints. Additionally, the analysis in this work relies on verification of robot behaviors using fundamental robot-obstacle experimental scenarios. To showcase the effectiveness of our method we compare three representative object-aware controllers. The comparison uses metrics originating from the design considerations. From the analysis, we find that the design of object-aware controllers often lacks kinematic considerations, continuity of control points, and stability in movement profiles. We conclude that this framework can be used in the future to design, compare, and benchmark obstacle avoidance methods.
Caleb Escobedo, Nataliya Nechyporenko, Shreyas Kadekodi, Alessandro Roncone
IROS3
2021 librec-auto: A Tool for Recommender Systems Experimentation
abstract
Recommender systems are complex. They integrate the individual needs of users with the characteristics of particular domains of application which may span items from large and potentially heterogeneous collections. Extensive experimentation is required to understand the multidimensional properties of recommendation algorithms and the fit between algorithm and application. librec-auto is a tool that automates many aspects of off-line batch recommender system experimentation. It has a large library of state-of-the-art and historical recommendation algorithms and a wide variety of evaluation metrics. It further supports the study of diversity and fairness in recommendation through the integration of re-ranking algorithms and fairness-aware metrics. It supports declarative configuration for reproducible experiment management and supports multiple forms of hyper-parameter optimization.
Nasim Sonboli, Masoud Mansoury, Ziyue Guo, Shreyas Kadekodi, Weiwen Liu, Robin D. Burke
CIKM4