Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gilbert Antonius
dblp:305/1698
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 50% Machine learning and data management · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
learned database components |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PerfGuard: Deploying ML-for-Systems without Performance Regressions, Almost! · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PerfGuard: Deploying ML-for-Systems without Performance Regressions, Almost! · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance diagnosis
performance regression detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | PerfGuard: Deploying ML-for-Systems without Performance Regressions, Almost! · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pre-production experimentation · 1.0deep learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | PerfGuard: Deploying ML-for-Systems without Performance Regressions, Almost!abstractModern data processing systems require optimization at massive scale, and using machine learning to optimize these systems (ML-for-systems) has shown promising results. Unfortunately, ML-for-systems is subject to over generalizations that do not capture the large variety of workload patterns, and tend to augment the performance of certain subsets in the workload while regressing performance for others. In this paper, we introduce a performance safeguard system, called PerfGuard , that designs pre-production experiments for deploying ML-for-systems. Instead of searching the entire space of query plans (a well-known, intractable problem), we focus on query plan deltas (a significantly smaller space). PerfGuard formalizes these differences, and correlates plan deltas to important feedback signals, like execution cost. We describe the deep learning architecture and the end-to-end pipeline in PerfGuard that could be used with general relational databases. We show that this architecture improves on baseline models, and that our pipeline identifies key query plan components as major contributors to plan disparity. Offline experimentation shows PerfGuard as a promising approach, with many opportunities for future improvement. H. M. Sajjad Hossain, Marc T. Friedman, Hiren Patel, Shi Qiao 0001, Soundar Srinivasan, Markus Weimer, Remmelt Ammerlaan, Lucas Rosenblatt, Gilbert Antonius, Peter Orenberg, Vijay Ramani, Abhishek Roy 0008, Irene Rogan Shaffer, Alekh Jindal |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 9 |