Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianxing Yang

dblp:305/2195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-5547-8624ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 56% Performance modeling and evaluation · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
MPI benchmarking
0.912025
Critique of "Productivity, Portability, Performance Data-Centric Python" by SCC Team From Sun Yat-sen University · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
High-performance computing › performance engineering
performance reproducibility
0.912025
Critique of "Productivity, Portability, Performance Data-Centric Python" by SCC Team From Sun Yat-sen University · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.312025
Critique of "Productivity, Portability, Performance Data-Centric Python" by SCC Team From Sun Yat-sen University · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reproducibility study · 0.9cluster benchmarking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Critique of "Productivity, Portability, Performance Data-Centric Python" by SCC Team From Sun Yat-sen University
abstract
In SC21, Ziogas et al. proposed Data-Centric (DaCe) Python. It attains high performance and portability, and further extends the original productivity of Python. This paper analyzes the reproducibility of the DaCe paper as part of the SC22 Student Cluster Competition (SCC). The reproduction experiments are conducted on the Azure CycleCloud. Different from the DaCe paper, we use AMD EPYC 7V73X processors for CPU-based experiments. We successfully reproduce most of the results of the DaCe paper. The remaining results are also explainable.
Tengyang Zheng, Tianxing Yang, Siran Liu, Shengyou Lu, Guangnan Feng, Zhiguang Chen 0001, Dan Huang 0001
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3