In this paper, we present and study the Hamming distance oracle problem. In this problem, the task is to preprocess two strings S and T of lengths n and m, respectively, to obtain a data structure that is able to return the Hamming distance between a substring of S and a substring of T. For strings over a constant-size alphabet, we show that for every x ≤ min{n,m} there is a data structure with Õ(nm/x) preprocessing time and O(x) query time. We also provide a conditional lower bound, showing that for every ε > 0 there is no combinatorial data structure with query time O(x) and preprocessing time O((nm/x)^{1-ε}) unless combinatorial fast matrix multiplication is possible. For strings over a general alphabet, we present a data structure with Õ(nm/√x) pre-processing time and O(x) query time for every x ≤ min {n,m}. Moreover, for every ε > 0 we provide a data structure with a preprocessing time of Õ((n+m)/ε³) that returns with high probability a (1±ε) approximation of the Hamming distance of two input substrings. The query time of the approximation data structure is Õ(1/ε²).

Hairpin completion, derived from the hairpin formation observed in DNA biochemistry, is an operation applied to strings, particularly useful in DNA computing. Conceptually, a right hairpin completion operation transforms a string $S$ into $S\cdot S'$ where $S'$ is the reverse complement of a prefix of $S$. Similarly, a left hairpin completion operation transforms a string $S$ into $S'\cdot S$ where $S'$ is the reverse complement of a suffix of $S$. The hairpin completion distance from $S$ to $T$ is the minimum number of hairpin completion operations needed to transform $S$ into $T$. Recently Boneh et al. showed an $O(n^2)$ time algorithm for finding the hairpin completion distance between two strings of length at most $n$. In this paper we show that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there is no $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$-time algorithm for the hairpin completion distance problem unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false. Thus, under SETH, the time complexity of the hairpin completion distance problem is quadratic, up to sub-polynomial factors.

We study a natural type of repetitions in 2-dimensional strings. Such a repetition, called a matching frame, is a rectangular substring of size at least 2× 2 with equal marginal rows and equal marginal columns. Matching frames first appeared in literature in the context of Wang tiles. We present two algorithms finding a matching frame with the maximum perimeter in a given n× m input string. The first algorithm solves the problem exactly in Õ(n^{2.5}) time (assuming n ≥ m). The second algorithm finds a (1-ε)-approximate solution in Õ((nm)/ε⁴) time, which is near linear in the size of the input for constant ε. In particular, by setting ε = O(1) the second algorithm decides the existence of a matching frame in a given string in Õ(nm) time. Some technical elements and structural properties used in these algorithms can be of independent interest.

The main contribution of this paper is a new improved variant of the laser method for designing matrix multiplication algorithms. Building upon the recent techniques of [Duan, Wu, Zhou, FOCS 2023], the new method introduces several new ingredients that not only yield an improved bound on the matrix multiplication exponent $ω$, but also improve the known bounds on rectangular matrix multiplication by [Le Gall and Urrutia, SODA 2018]. In particular, the new bound on $ω$ is $ω\le 2.371552$ (improved from $ω\le 2.371866$). For the dual matrix multiplication exponent $α$ defined as the largest $α$ for which $ω(1,α,1)=2$, we obtain the improvement $α\ge 0.321334$ (improved from $α\ge 0.31389$). Similar improvements are obtained for various other exponents for multiplying rectangular matrices.

A Dyck sequence is a sequence of opening and closing parentheses (of various types) that is balanced. The Dyck edit distance of a given sequence of parentheses S is the smallest number of edit operations (insertions, deletions, and substitutions) needed to transform S into a Dyck sequence. We consider the threshold Dyck edit distance problem, where the input is a sequence of parentheses S and a positive integer k , and the goal is to compute the Dyck edit distance of S only if the distance is at most k , and otherwise report that the distance is larger than k . Backurs and Onak [PODS’16] showed that the threshold Dyck edit distance problem can be solved in O ( n + k 16 ) time. In this work, we design new algorithms for the threshold Dyck edit distance problem which costs O ( n + k 4.544184 ) time with high probability or O ( n + k 4.853059 ) deterministically. Our algorithms combine several new structural properties of the Dyck edit distance problem, a refined algorithm for fast (min, +) matrix product, and a careful modification of ideas used in Valiant’s parsing algorithm.

A Dyck sequence is a sequence of opening and closing parentheses (of various types) that is balanced. The Dyck edit distance of a given sequence of parentheses S is the smallest number of edit operations (insertions, deletions, and substitutions) needed to transform S into a Dyck sequence. We consider the threshold Dyck edit distance problem, where the input is a sequence of parentheses S and a positive integer k, and the goal is to compute the Dyck edit distance of S only if the distance is at most k, and otherwise report that the distance is larger than k. Backurs and Onak [PODS'16] showed that the threshold Dyck edit distance problem can be solved in O(n + k16) time. In this work, we design new algorithms for the threshold Dyck edit distance problem which costs O(n + k4.782036) time with high probability or O(n + k4.853059) deterministically. Our algorithms combine several new structural properties of the Dyck edit distance problem, a refined algorithm for fast (min, +) matrix product, and a careful modification of ideas used in Valiant's parsing algorithm.