Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phorutai Pearngam

dblp:305/6415 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0953-7851ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics
0.512021
MHCVision: estimation of global and local false discovery rate for MHC class I peptide binding prediction · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
peptide-MHC binding prediction
0.512021
MHCVision: estimation of global and local false discovery rate for MHC class I peptide binding prediction · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
epitope prediction
0.112021
MHCVision: estimation of global and local false discovery rate for MHC class I peptide binding prediction · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local false discovery rate · 0.5expectation-maximization · 0.5beta mixture model · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 MHCVision: estimation of global and local false discovery rate for MHC class I peptide binding prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: MHC-peptide binding prediction has been widely used for understanding the immune response of individuals or populations, each carrying different MHC molecules as well as for the development of immunotherapeutics. The results from MHC-peptide binding prediction tools are mostly reported as a predicted binding affinity (IC50) and the percentile rank score, and global thresholds e.g. IC50 value < 500 nM or percentile rank < 2% are generally recommended for distinguishing binding peptides from non-binding peptides. However, it is difficult to evaluate statistically the probability of an individual peptide binding prediction to be true or false solely considering predicted scores. Therefore, statistics describing the overall global false discovery rate (FDR) and local FDR, also called posterior error probability (PEP) are required to give statistical context to the natively produced scores. RESULT: We have developed an algorithm and code implementation, called MHCVision, for estimation of FDR and PEP values for the predicted results of MHC-peptide binding prediction from the NetMHCpan tool. MHCVision performs parameter estimation using a modified expectation maximization framework for a two-component beta mixture model, representing the distribution of true and false scores of the predicted dataset. We can then estimate the PEP of an individual peptide's predicted score, and conversely the probability that it is true. We demonstrate that the use of global FDR and PEP estimation can provide a better trade-off between sensitivity and precision over using currently recommended thresholds from tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/PGB-LIV/MHCVision. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Phorutai Pearngam, Sira Sriswasdi, Trairak Pisitkun, Andrew R. Jones
Bioinform.1