Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yueran Yang

dblp:305/7944 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 91% Mathematical optimization · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial semi-bandits
0.512021
The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle · NeurIPS 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.512021
The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle · NeurIPS 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
thompson sampling
0.512021
The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.112021
The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 0.5greedy oracle · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Robust and Generalizable Immune-Related Signature for Sepsis Diagnostics
abstract
High-throughput sequencing can detect tens of thousands of genes in parallel, providing opportunities for improving the diagnostic accuracy of multiple diseases including sepsis, which is an aggressive inflammatory response to infection that can cause organ failure and death. Early screening of sepsis is essential in clinic, but no effective diagnostic biomarkers are available yet. Here, we present a novel method, Recurrent Logistic Regression, to identify diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis from the blood transcriptome data. A panel including five immune-related genes, LRRN3, IL2RB, FCER1A, TLR5, and S100A12, are determined as diagnostic biomarkers (LIFTS) for sepsis. LIFTS discriminates patients with sepsis from normal controls in high accuracy (AUROC = 0.9959 on average; IC = [0.9722-1.0]) on nine validation cohorts across three independent platforms, which outperforms existing markers. Our analysis determined an accurate prediction model and reproducible transcriptome biomarkers that can lay a foundation for clinical diagnostic tests and biological mechanistic studies.
Yueran Yang, Yu Zhang 0151, Shuai Li 0010, Xubin Zheng, Man Hon Wong 0001, Kwong-Sak Leung, Lixin Cheng
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.1
2021 The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle
abstract
Thompson sampling (TS) has attracted a lot of interest in the bandit area. It was introduced in the 1930s but has not been theoretically proven until recent years. All of its analysis in the combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) setting requires an exact oracle to provide optimal solutions with any input. However, such an oracle is usually not feasible since many combinatorial optimization problems are NP-hard and only approximation oracles are available. An example \cite{WangC18} has shown the failure of TS to learn with an approximation oracle. However, this oracle is uncommon and is designed only for a specific problem instance. It is still an open question whether the convergence analysis of TS can be extended beyond the exact oracle in CMAB. In this paper, we study this question under the greedy oracle, which is a common (approximation) oracle with theoretical guarantees to solve many (offline) combinatorial optimization problems. We provide a problem-dependent regret lower bound of order $\Omega(\log T/\Delta^2)$ to quantify the hardness of TS to solve CMAB problems with greedy oracle, where $T$ is the time horizon and $\Delta$ is some reward gap. We also provide an almost matching regret upper bound. These are the first theoretical results for TS to solve CMAB with a common approximation oracle and break the misconception that TS cannot work with approximation oracles.
Fang Kong 0002, Yueran Yang, Wei Chen 0013, Shuai Li 0010
NeurIPS2