Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

David Walz

dblp:305/7982 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 83% Graph learning · 17%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 77% Distributed computing theory · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
2.032025
BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022
SnAKe: Bayesian Optimization with Pathwise Exploration · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
mixed-integer optimization
0.712023
Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function optimization
0.612022
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization
0.612022
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering
chemistry
0.312025
BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Distributed computing theory
symmetry breaking
0.212023
Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian optimization · 2.3design of experiments · 1.7graph indexing · 1.3symmetry-breaking constraints · 0.7symmetry breaking constraints · 0.7mixed-integer programming · 0.7mixed integer programming · 0.7tree-ensemble kernel · 0.6gaussian process regression · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments
abstract
Our open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting.
Johannes P. Dürholt, Thomas S. Asche, Johanna Kleinekorte, Gabriel Mancino-Ball, Benjamin Schiller, Simon Sung, Julian Keupp, Aaron Osburg, Toby Boyne, Ruth Misener, Rosona Eldred, Chrysoula Kappatou, Robert M. Lee, Dominik Linzner, Wagner Steuer Costa, David Walz, Niklas Wulkow, Behrang Shafei
J. Mach. Learn. Res.16
2023 Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking
abstract
Optimization over trained machine learning models has applications including: verification, minimizing neural acquisition functions, and integrating a trained surrogate into a larger decision-making problem. This paper formulates and solves optimization problems constrained by trained graph neural networks (GNNs). To circumvent the symmetry issue caused by graph isomorphism, we propose two types of symmetry-breaking constraints: one indexing a node 0 and one indexing the remaining nodes by lexicographically ordering their neighbor sets. To guarantee that adding these constraints will not remove all symmetric solutions, we construct a graph indexing algorithm and prove that the resulting graph indexing satisfies the proposed symmetry-breaking constraints. For the classical GNN architectures considered in this paper, optimizing over a GNN with a fixed graph is equivalent to optimizing over a dense neural network. Thus, we study the case where the input graph is not fixed, implying that each edge is a decision variable, and develop two mixed-integer optimization formulations. To test our symmetry-breaking strategies and optimization formulations, we consider an application in molecular design.
Shiqiang Zhang, Juan S. Campos, Christian Feldmann, David Walz, Frederik Sandfort, Miriam Mathea, Calvin Tsay, Ruth Misener
NeurIPS4
2022 SnAKe: Bayesian Optimization with Pathwise Exploration
abstract
"Bayesian Optimization is a very effective tool for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Inspired by applications developing and characterizing reaction chemistry using droplet microfluidic reactors, we consider a novel setting where the expense of evaluating the function can increase significantly when making large input changes between iterations. We further assume we are working asynchronously, meaning we have to decide on new queries before we finish evaluating previous experiments. This paper investigates the problem and introduces 'Sequential Bayesian Optimization via Adaptive Connecting Samples' (SnAKe), which provides a solution by considering large batches of queries and preemptively building optimization paths that minimize input costs. We investigate some convergence properties and empirically show that the algorithm is able to achieve regret similar to classical Bayesian Optimization algorithms in both the synchronous and asynchronous settings, while reducing the input costs significantly. We show the method is robust to the choice of its single hyper-parameter and provide a parameter-free alternative."
Jose Pablo Folch, Shiqiang Zhang, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, David Walz, Calvin Tsay, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener
NeurIPS5
2022 Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces
abstract
Tree ensembles can be well-suited for black-box optimization tasks such as algorithm tuning and neural architecture search, as they achieve good predictive performance with little or no manual tuning, naturally handle discrete feature spaces, and are relatively insensitive to outliers in the training data. Two well-known challenges in using tree ensembles for black-box optimization are (i) effectively quantifying model uncertainty for exploration and (ii) optimizing over the piece-wise constant acquisition function. To address both points simultaneously, we propose using the kernel interpretation of tree ensembles as a Gaussian Process prior to obtain model variance estimates, and we develop a compatible optimization formulation for the acquisition function. The latter further allows us to seamlessly integrate known constraints to improve sampling efficiency by considering domain-knowledge in engineering settings and modeling search space symmetries, e.g., hierarchical relationships in neural architecture search. Our framework performs as well as state-of-the-art methods for unconstrained black-box optimization over continuous/discrete features and outperforms competing methods for problems combining mixed-variable feature spaces and known input constraints.
Alexander Thebelt, Calvin Tsay, Robert M. Lee, Nathan Sudermann-Merx, David Walz, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener
NeurIPS5