Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Akshatha Arodi

dblp:305/9904 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Language models and text generation · 22%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.012026
Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding › legal text analysis
compliance checking
1.012026
Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.812024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.812024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection
0.812024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge-based systems › rule-based systems
rule-based reasoning
0.312026
Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring · AAAI 2026
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics › robotic inspection
powerline inspection
0.212024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
robotic inspection
0.212024
CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212023
The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources · ACL (1) 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.7annotation · 1.7judge model · 1.0fine-tuning · 1.0vision-language model · 0.8patchcore · 0.8few-shot learning · 0.8benchmark evaluation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring
abstract
Modern slavery affects millions of people worldwide, and regulatory frameworks such as Modern Slavery Acts now require companies to publish detailed disclosures. However, these statements are often vague and inconsistent, making manual review time-consuming and difficult to scale. While NLP offers a promising path forward, high-stakes compliance tasks require more than accurate classification: they demand transparent, rule-aligned outputs that legal experts can verify. Existing applications of large language models (LLMs) often reduce complex regulatory assessments to binary decisions, lacking the necessary structure for robust legal scrutiny. We argue that compliance verification is fundamentally a rule-matching problem: it requires evaluating whether textual statements adhere to well-defined regulatory rules. To this end, we propose a novel framework that harnesses AI for rule-level compliance verification while preserving expert oversight. At its core is the Compliance Alignment Judge (CA-Judge), which evaluates model-generated justifications based on their fidelity to statutory requirements. Using this feedback, we train the Compliance Alignment LLM (CALLM), a model that produces rule-consistent, human-verifiable outputs. CALLM improves predictive performance and generates outputs that are both transparent and legally grounded, offering a more verifiable and actionable solution for real-world compliance analysis.
Akshatha Arodi, Jian-Yun Nie, Arsène Fansi Tchango
AAAI2
2025 AIMSCheck: Leveraging LLMs for AI-Assisted Review of Modern Slavery Statements Across Jurisdictions
abstract
Modern Slavery Acts mandate that corporations disclose their efforts to combat modern slavery, aiming to enhance transparency and strengthen practices for its eradication. However, verifying these statements remains challenging due to their complex, diversified language and the sheer number of statements that must be reviewed. The development of NLP tools to assist in this task is also difficult due to a scarcity of annotated data. Furthermore, as modern slavery transparency legislation has been introduced in several countries, the generalizability of such tools across legal jurisdictions must be studied. To address these challenges, we work with domain experts to make two key contributions. First, we present AIMS.uk and AIMS.ca, newly annotated datasets from the UK and Canada to enable cross-jurisdictional evaluation. Second, we introduce AIMSCheck, an end-to-end framework for compliance validation. AIMSCheck decomposes the compliance assessment task into three levels, enhancing interpretability and practical applicability. Our experiments show that models trained on an Australian dataset generalize well across UK and Canadian jurisdictions, demonstrating the potential for broader application in compliance monitoring. We release the benchmark datasets and AIMSCheck to the public to advance AI-adoption in compliance assessment and drive further research in this field.
Adriana Eufrosina Bora, Akshatha Arodi, Duoyi Zhang, Jordan Bannister, Mirko Bronzi, Arsène Fansi Tchango, Md. Abul Bashar, Richi Nayak, Kerrie L. Mengersen
ACL (1)2
2024 CableInspect-AD: An Expert-Annotated Anomaly Detection Dataset
abstract
Machine learning models are increasingly being deployed in real-world contexts. However, systematic studies on their transferability to specific and critical applications are underrepresented in the research literature. An important example is visual anomaly detection (VAD) for robotic power line inspection. While existing VAD methods perform well in controlled environments, real-world scenarios present diverse and unexpected anomalies that current datasets fail to capture. To address this gap, we introduce CableInspect-AD, a high-quality, publicly available dataset created and annotated by domain experts from Hydro-Québec, a Canadian public utility. This dataset includes high-resolution images with challenging real-world anomalies, covering defects with varying severity levels. To address the challenges of collecting diverse anomalous and nominal examples for setting a detection threshold, we propose an enhancement to the celebrated PatchCore algorithm. This enhancement enables its use in scenarios with limited labeled data. We also present a comprehensive evaluation protocol based on cross-validation to assess models' performances. We evaluate our Enhanced-PatchCore for few-shot and many-shot detection, and Vision-Language Models for zero-shot detection. While promising, these models struggle to detect all anomalies, highlighting the dataset's value as a challenging benchmark for the broader research community. Project page: https://mila-iqia.github.io/cableinspect-ad/.
Akshatha Arodi, Margaux Luck, Jean-Luc Bedwani, Aldo Zaimi, Nicolas Pouliot, Julien Beaudry, Gaétan Marceau-Caron
NeurIPS1
2023 The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources
abstract
Akshatha Arodi, Martin Pömsl, Kaheer Suleman, Adam Trischler, Alexandra Olteanu, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Akshatha Arodi, Martin Pömsl, Kaheer Suleman, Adam Trischler, Alexandra Olteanu, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung
ACL (1)1