EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simona Georgescu
dblp:305/9907
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3948-0323ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 88% Machine translation · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities
historical linguistics |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstruction · EMNLP 2024 RoBoCoP: A Comprehensive ROmance BOrrowing COgnate Package and Benchmark for Multilingual Cognate Identification · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cognate identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Friend or Foe? A Computational Investigation of Semantic False Friends across Romance Languages · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Friend or Foe? A Computational Investigation of Semantic False Friends across Romance Languages · EMNLP 2025 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › computational linguistics
cognate identification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RoBoCoP: A Comprehensive ROmance BOrrowing COgnate Package and Benchmark for Multilingual Cognate Identification · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | RoBoCoP: A Comprehensive ROmance BOrrowing COgnate Package and Benchmark for Multilingual Cognate Identification · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.3deep learning · 1.3etymological dictionary analysis · 0.9sequence modeling · 0.8computational historical linguistics · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Friend or Foe? A Computational Investigation of Semantic False Friends across Romance LanguagesabstractIn this paper we present a comprehensive analysis of lexical semantic divergence between cognate words and borrowings in the Romance languages.We experiment with different algorithms for false friend detection including deceptive cognate and deceptive borrowings and correction and evaluate them systematically on cognate and borrowing pairs in the five Romance languages.We use the most complete and reliable dataset of cognate words and borrowings based on etymological dictionaries for the five main Romance languages (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Romanian) to extract deceptive cognates and borrowings automatically based on usage, and freely publish the lexicon of obtained true and deceptive cognate and borrowings in every Romance language pair. Ana Sabina Uban, Liviu P. Dinu, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Simona Georgescu, Claudia Vlad |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | Pater Incertus? There Is a Solution: Automatic Discrimination between Cognates and Borrowings for Romance LanguagesabstractIdentifying the type of relationship between words (cognates, borrowings, inherited) provides a deeper insight into the history of a language and allows for a better characterization of language relatedness. In this paper, we propose a computational approach for discriminating between cognates and borrowings, one of the most difficult tasks in historical linguistics. We compare the discriminative power of graphic and phonetic features and we analyze the underlying linguistic factors that prove relevant in the classification task. We perform experiments for pairs of languages in the Romance language family (French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Romanian), based on a comprehensive database of Romance cognates and borrowings. To our knowledge, this is one of the first attempts of this kind and the most comprehensive in terms of covered languages. Liviu P. Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Alina Maria Cristea, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas |
LREC/COLING | 5 |
| 2024 | Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstructionabstractLiviu P Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Liviu P. Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2023 | RoBoCoP: A Comprehensive ROmance BOrrowing COgnate Package and Benchmark for Multilingual Cognate IdentificationabstractThe identification of cognates is a fundamental process in historical linguistics, on which any further research is based.Even though there are several cognate databases for Romance languages, they are rather scattered, incomplete, noisy, contain unreliable information, or have uncertain availability.In this paper we introduce a comprehensive database of Romance cognates and borrowings based on the etymological information provided by the dictionaries (the largest known database of this kind, in our best knowledge).We extract pairs of cognates between any two Romance languages by parsing electronic dictionaries of Romanian, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and French.Based on this resource, we propose a strong benchmark for the automatic detection of cognates, by applying machine learning and deep learning based methods on any two pairs of Romance languages.We find that automatic identification of cognates is possible with accuracy averaging around 94% for the more difficult task formulations. Liviu P. Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Anca P. Dinu, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas |
EMNLP | 6 |