Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Deniz S. Ones

dblp:306/1105 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › motion sensing
motion sensor data
0.512021
WristPrint: Characterizing User Re-identification Risks from Wrist-worn Accelerometry Data · CCS 2021
Privacy and data protection › privacy risk assessment
re-identification risk
0.512021
WristPrint: Characterizing User Re-identification Risks from Wrist-worn Accelerometry Data · CCS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

open-set recognition · 1.0deep learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 WristPrint: Characterizing User Re-identification Risks from Wrist-worn Accelerometry Data
abstract
Public release of wrist-worn motion sensor data is growing. They enable and accelerate research in developing new algorithms to passively track daily activities, resulting in improved health and wellness utilities of smartwatches and activity trackers. But, when combined with sensitive attribute inference attack and linkage attack via re-identification of the same user in multiple datasets, undisclosed sensitive attributes can be revealed to unintended organizations with potentially adverse consequences for unsuspecting data contributing users. To guide both users and data collecting researchers, we characterize the re-identification risks inherent in motion sensor data collected from wrist-worn devices in users' natural environment. For this purpose, we use an open-set formulation, train a deep learning architecture with a new loss function, and apply our model to a new data set consisting of 10 weeks of daily sensor wearing by 353 users. We find that re-identification risk increases with an increase in the activity intensity. On average, such risk is 96% for a user when sharing a full day of sensor data.
Nazir Saleheen, Md. Azim Ullah, Supriyo Chakraborty, Deniz S. Ones, Mani Srivastava 0001, Santosh Kumar 0001
CCS4