Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patrick Rockenschaub
dblp:306/1153
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6499-7933ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
electronic health records |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MEDS: Building Models and Tools in a Reproducible Health AI Ecosystem · KDD (2) 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics › clinical AI
clinical machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Yet Another ICU Benchmark: A Flexible Multi-Center Framework for Clinical ML · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data standardization · 1.7benchmarking · 1.7preprocessing pipeline · 1.5deep learning · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MEDS: Building Models and Tools in a Reproducible Health AI EcosystemabstractHealth AI suffers from a systemic reproducibility crisis that irreparably hinders research across both academia and industry [4,5].One key tool poised to solve this crisis is the Medical Event Data Standard (MEDS), a comprehensive data format and open-source ecosystem designed to enhance reproducibility and interoperability of AI research using longitudinal Electronic Health Records (EHR) [6].Currently adopted by over 15 institutions globally, MEDS encompasses various open-source tools, published models, and data processing pipelines, enabling streamlined model development and robust benchmarking.In this tutorial, participants will gain key hands-on experience in working with the MEDS format to perform efficient, reproducible, state-of-the-art AI research over real health data.Participants will transform data into the MEDS format, preprocess data, build predictive models, and contribute to the decentralized MEDS-DEV benchmarking platform.Interactive exercises using Jupyter notebooks will provide hands-on experience and practical skills for reproducible health AI research.Attendees will leave equipped Matthew B. A. McDermott, Justin Xu, Teya S. Bergamaschi, Hyewon Jeong, Simon A. Lee, Nassim Oufattole, Patrick Rockenschaub, Kamile Stankeviciute, Ethan Steinberg, Jimeng Sun 0001, Robin Van De Water, Michael Wornow, John Wu, Zhenbang Wu |
KDD (2) | 7 |
| 2024 | Yet Another ICU Benchmark: A Flexible Multi-Center Framework for Clinical MLabstractMedical applications of machine learning (ML) have experienced a surge in popularity in recent years. Given the abundance of available data from electronic health records, the intensive care unit (ICU) is a natural habitat for ML. Models have been proposed to address numerous ICU prediction tasks like the early detection of complications. While authors frequently report state-of-the-art performance, it is challenging to verify claims of superiority. Datasets and code are not always published, and cohort definitions, preprocessing pipelines, and training setups are difficult to reproduce. This work introduces Yet Another ICU Benchmark (YAIB), a modular framework that allows researchers to define reproducible and comparable clinical ML experiments; we offer an end-to-end solution from cohort definition to model evaluation. The framework natively supports most open-access ICU datasets (MIMIC III/IV, eICU, HiRID, AUMCdb) and is easily adaptable to future ICU datasets. Combined with a transparent preprocessing pipeline and extensible training code for multiple ML and deep learning models, YAIB enables unified model development, transfer, and evaluation. Our benchmark comes with five predefined established prediction tasks (mortality, acute kidney injury, sepsis, kidney function, and length of stay) developed in collaboration with clinicians. Adding further tasks is straightforward by design. Using YAIB, we demonstrate that the choice of dataset, cohort definition, and preprocessing have a major impact on the prediction performance — often more so than model class — indicating an urgent need for YAIB as a holistic benchmarking tool. We provide our work to the clinical ML community to accelerate method development and enable real-world clinical implementations. Robin Van De Water, Hendrik Schmidt, Paul W. G. Elbers, Patrick Thoral, Bert Arnrich, Patrick Rockenschaub |
ICLR | 6 |