Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arthur Zamarin

dblp:306/1318 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-4785-1077ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 87% Privacy and data protection · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
ballot secrecy
0.512021
DEMO: A Secure Voting System for Score Based Elections · CCS 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
secure voting
0.512021
DEMO: A Secure Voting System for Score Based Elections · CCS 2021
Privacy and data protection › anonymity
voter privacy
0.112021
DEMO: A Secure Voting System for Score Based Elections · CCS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

secure multiparty computation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Secure order based voting using distributed tallying
abstract
Electronic voting systems have significant advantages in comparison with physical voting systems. One of the main challenges in e-voting systems is to secure the voting process: namely, to certify that the computed results are consistent with the cast ballots and that the voters’ privacy is preserved. We propose herein a secure voting protocol for elections that are governed by order-based voting rules. Our protocol, in which the tallying task is distributed among several independent talliers, offers perfect ballot secrecy in the sense that it issues only the required output while no other information on the cast ballots is revealed. Such perfect secrecy, achieved by employing secure multiparty computation tools, may increase the voters’ confidence and, consequently, encourage them to vote according to their true preferences. We implemented a demo of a voting system that is based on our protocol and we describe herein the system’s components and its operation. Our implementation demonstrates that our secure order-based voting protocol can be readily implemented in real-life large-scale electronic elections.
Tamir Tassa, Lihi Naamani Dery, Arthur Zamarin
J. Inf. Secur. Appl.3
2021 DEMO: A Secure Voting System for Score Based Elections
abstract
Dery et al. recently proposed a secure voting protocol for score-based elections, where independent talliers perform the tallying procedure. The protocol offers perfect ballot secrecy: it outputs the identity of the winner(s), but keeps all other information secret, even from the talliers. This high level of privacy, which may encourage voters to vote truthfully, and the protocol's extremely lightweight nature, make it a most adequate and powerful tool for democracies of any size. We have implemented that system and in this work we describe the system's components - election administrators, voters and talliers - and its operation. Our implementation is in Python and is open source. We view this demo as an essential step towards convincing decision makers in communities that practice score-based elections to adopt it as their election platform.
Lihi Naamani Dery, Tamir Tassa, Avishay Yanai, Arthur Zamarin
CCS4