Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haoyi You

dblp:306/1577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning
0.712023
DeCOM: Decomposed Policy for Constrained Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.712023
DeCOM: Decomposed Policy for Constrained Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
policy factorization
0.712023
DeCOM: Decomposed Policy for Constrained Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.712023
User-Oriented Robust Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
robust policy learning
0.712023
User-Oriented Robust Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning
0.712023
User-Oriented Robust Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user preference weighting · 0.7policy decomposition · 0.7max-min optimization · 0.7convergence analysis · 0.7constrained optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 DeCOM: Decomposed Policy for Constrained Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In recent years, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has presented impressive performance in various applications. However, physical limitations, budget restrictions, and many other factors usually impose constraints on a multi-agent system (MAS), which cannot be handled by traditional MARL frameworks. Specifically, this paper focuses on constrained MASes where agents work cooperatively to maximize the expected team-average return under various constraints on expected team-average costs, and develops a constrained cooperative MARL framework, named DeCOM, for such MASes. In particular, DeCOM decomposes the policy of each agent into two modules, which empowers information sharing among agents to achieve better cooperation. In addition, with such modularization, the training algorithm of DeCOM separates the original constrained optimization into an unconstrained optimization on reward and a constraints satisfaction problem on costs. DeCOM then iteratively solves these problems in a computationally efficient manner, which makes DeCOM highly scalable. We also provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence of DeCOM's policy update algorithm. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to show the effectiveness of DeCOM with various types of costs in both moderate-scale and large-scale (with 500 agents) environments that originate from real-world applications.
Zhaoxing Yang, Haiming Jin, Haoyi You, Guiyun Fan, Xinbing Wang, Chenghu Zhou
AAAI4
2023 User-Oriented Robust Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Recently, improving the robustness of policies across different environments attracts increasing attention in the reinforcement learning (RL) community. Existing robust RL methods mostly aim to achieve the max-min robustness by optimizing the policy’s performance in the worst-case environment. However, in practice, a user that uses an RL policy may have different preferences over its performance across environments. Clearly, the aforementioned max-min robustness is oftentimes too conservative to satisfy user preference. Therefore, in this paper, we integrate user preference into policy learning in robust RL, and propose a novel User-Oriented Robust RL (UOR-RL) framework. Specifically, we define a new User-Oriented Robustness (UOR) metric for RL, which allocates different weights to the environments according to user preference and generalizes the max-min robustness metric. To optimize the UOR metric, we develop two different UOR-RL training algorithms for the scenarios with or without a priori known environment distribution, respectively. Theoretically, we prove that our UOR-RL training algorithms converge to near-optimal policies even with inaccurate or completely no knowledge about the environment distribution. Furthermore, we carry out extensive experimental evaluations in 6 MuJoCo tasks. The experimental results demonstrate that UOR-RL is comparable to the state-of-the-art baselines under the average-case and worst-case performance metrics, and more importantly establishes new state-of-the-art performance under the UOR metric.
Haoyi You, Beichen Yu, Haiming Jin, Zhaoxing Yang
AAAI1