Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Debapriya Tula
dblp:306/1703
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › masked generative modeling
masked generative transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
visual generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter sharing · 0.9computation caching · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time ScalingabstractRecent advances in visual generation have made significant strides in producing content of exceptional quality. However, most methods suffer from a fundamental problem - a bottleneck of inference computational efficiency. Most of these algorithms involve multiple passes over a transformer model to generate tokens or denoise inputs. However, the model size is kept consistent throughout all iterations, which makes it computationally expensive. In this work, we aim to address this issue primarily through two key ideas - (a) not all parts of the generation process need equal compute, and we design a decode time model scaling schedule to utilize compute effectively, and (b) we can cache and reuse some of the intermediate computation. Combining these two ideas leads to using smaller models to process more tokens while large models process fewer tokens. These different-sized models do not increase the parameter size, as they share parameters. We rigorously experiment with ImageNet256$\times$256 , UCF101, and Kinetics600 to showcase the efficacy of the proposed method for image/video generation and frame prediction. Our experiments show that with almost $3\times$ less compute than baseline, our model obtains competitive performance. Sahil Goyal, Debapriya Tula, Gagan Jain, Pradeep Shenoy, Prateek Jain 0002, Sujoy Paul |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Target aware network architecture search and compression for efficient knowledge transfer
S. H. Shabbeer Basha, Debapriya Tula, Sravan Kumar Vinakota, Shiv Ram Dubey |
Multim. Syst. | 2 |