Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cankat Tilki
dblp:306/4853
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Learning paradigms · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Localisation of Regularised and Multiview Support Vector Machine Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
manifold regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Localisation of Regularised and Multiview Support Vector Machine Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multi-view learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Localisation of Regularised and Multiview Support Vector Machine Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Localisation of Regularised and Multiview Support Vector Machine Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.8representer theorem · 0.8interior-point method · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Localisation of Regularised and Multiview Support Vector Machine LearningabstractWe prove some representer theorems for a localised version of a semisupervised, manifold regularised and multiview support vector machine learning problem introduced by H.Q. Minh, L. Bazzani, and V. Murino, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(2016) 1-72, that involves operator valued positive semidefinite kernels and their reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. The results concern general cases when convex or nonconvex lossfunctions and finite or infinite dimensional underlying Hilbert spaces are considered. We show that the general framework allows infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces and nonconvex loss functions for some special cases, in particular in case the loss functions are Gâteaux differentiable. Detailed calculations are provided for the exponential least squares loss functions that lead to systems of partially nonlinear equations for which some Newton's approximation methods based on the interior point method can be used. Some numerical experiments are performed on a toy model that illustratethe tractability of the methods that we propose. Aurelian Gheondea, Cankat Tilki |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Augmenting Code Review Experience Through VisualizationabstractCode review is a systematic inspection of the code-base. It ensures that the software satisfies the required functionalities and standards; thus, it is an essential stage in the modern development process and is used frequently in the industry. For a successful review, the reviewer should be able to identify defects; therefore, the process is highly dependent on the awareness of the reviewer. Currently, code review is done by comparing the line-by-line differences on the codebase. However, this does not give structural information, such as design pattern changes or dependency changes between services.To address this problem, we propose an augmented next-generation code review experience using visual and holistic approaches to streamline the reviewing process. The proposed code review experience shows the structural representation of the change by visualizing it into a UML-like relationship diagram. Along with this diagram, the risk percentage for each commit is highlighted to emphasize the differences that possibly can be most affected by the change. An artifact map is also produced that includes issue-commit relation for bug tracking, to make reviewers aware of the frequent issues that are brought up. This map also highlights the change frequency of the files, for focusing the reviewers on the possibly vulnerable parts of the software for better quality reviews. The proposed visualizations have been implemented in a plugin-based proof-of-concept tool integrated within GitHub, supporting the visual reviewing of changes in codebases developed with Java language. Faruk Balci, Dilruba Sultan Haliloglu, Onur Sahin, Cankat Tilki, Mehmet Ata Yurtsever, Eray Tüzün |
VISSOFT | 4 |