Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haripriya Pulyassary

dblp:306/8031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4100-0678ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
distortion in social choice
0.912025
Constant-Factor Distortion Mechanisms for k-Committee Election · AAAI 2025
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-clustering
0.912025
Constant-Factor Distortion Mechanisms for k-Committee Election · AAAI 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › computational social choice
multiwinner voting
0.912025
Constant-Factor Distortion Mechanisms for k-Committee Election · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value queries · 0.9adaptive sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Adaptive Sampling for Minimum-Norm k-Clustering
abstract
In k-clustering problems, we are given a metric space (𝒞, d), and must choose a set S of k centers to open. Each client j ∈ 𝒞 incurs an assignment cost, which is the distance between j and center in S that it has been assigned to. In this work, we study the minimum-norm k-clustering problem, where we are given an arbitrary monotone symmetric norm f, and wish to open k centers so as to minimize f(assignment-cost vector). This is a powerful generalization, encompassing many classical k-clustering problems including the k-median, k-means, and k-center problems. A simple and efficient algorithmic idea is that of adaptive sampling, wherein we randomly choose the location of the next center to open with probability proportional to its "cost" under the currently chosen set. While this has yielded fast algorithms for some k-clustering problem, little is known for settings without "min-sum" objectives. We devise the first adaptive-sampling-based bicriteria constant-factor approximation algorithm for general minimum-norm k-clustering, vastly expanding the scope of problems handled by adaptive sampling. For the special case of Top_ℓ norms, which form a building block of monotone symmetric norms, we show that adaptive sampling yields an O(log k)-approximation algorithm.
Haripriya Pulyassary, Chaitanya Swamy
ESA1
2025 Constant-Factor Distortion Mechanisms for k-Committee Election
abstract
In the k-committee election problem, we wish to aggregate the preferences of n agents over a set of alternatives and select a committee of k alternatives that minimizes the cost incurred by the agents. While we typically assume that agent preferences are captured by a cardinal utility function, in many contexts we only have access to ordinal information, namely the agents' rankings over the outcomes. As preference rankings are not as expressive as cardinal utilities, a loss of efficiency is inevitable, and is quantified by the notion of distortion. We study the problem of electing a k-committee that minimizes the sum of the \ell-largest costs incurred by the agents, when agents and candidates are embedded in a metric space. This problem is called the \ell-centrum problem and captures both the utilitarian and egalitarian objectives. When k >= 2, it is not possible to compute a bounded-distortion committee using purely ordinal information. We develop the first algorithms (that we call mechanisms) for the \ell-centrum problem (when k >= 2), which achieve O(1)-distortion while eliciting only a very limited amount of cardinal information via value queries. We obtain two types of query-complexity guarantees: O(log k log n) queries per agent, and O(k^2 log^2 n) queries in total (while achieving O(1)-distortion in both cases). En route, we give a simple adaptive-sampling algorithm for the \ell-centrum k-clustering problem.
Haripriya Pulyassary, Chaitanya Swamy
AAAI1
2024 Network Flow Problems with Electric Vehicles
Haripriya Pulyassary, Kostas Kollias, Aaron Schild, David B. Shmoys, Manxi Wu
IPCO1