Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Arkhangelskiy

dblp:307/2971 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-9830-1252ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › i/o
i/o optimization
0.712023
Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023
Operating systems › resource management
storage management
0.712023
Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
network file system
0.712023
Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023
Storage systems › storage management
storage optimization
0.712023
Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 1.3kernel-level ML architecture · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning
abstract
Operating systems include many heuristic algorithms designed to improve overall storage performance and throughput. Because such heuristics cannot work well for all conditions and workloads, system designers resorted to exposing numerous tunable parameters to users—thus burdening users with continually optimizing their own storage systems and applications. Storage systems are usually responsible for most latency in I/O-heavy applications, so even a small latency improvement can be significant. Machine learning (ML) techniques promise to learn patterns, generalize from them, and enable optimal solutions that adapt to changing workloads. We propose that ML solutions become a first-class component in OSs and replace manual heuristics to optimize storage systems dynamically. In this article, we describe our proposed ML architecture, called KML. We developed a prototype KML architecture and applied it to two case studies: optimizing readahead and NFS read-size values. Our experiments show that KML consumes less than 4 KB of dynamic kernel memory, has a CPU overhead smaller than 0.2%, and yet can learn patterns and improve I/O throughput by as much as 2.3× and 15× for two case studies—even for complex, never-seen-before, concurrently running mixed workloads on different storage devices.
Ibrahim Umit Akgun, Ali Selman Aydin, Andrew Burford, Michael McNeill, Michael Arkhangelskiy, Erez Zadok
ACM Trans. Storage5