EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiaoyue Tang
dblp:307/3873
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 81% Security and privacy of machine learning · 19% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retraining · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retraining · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
second moment estimation · 1.5bias correction · 1.5membership inference attack · 0.8generated non-member data · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction)abstractThe Adam optimizer is a popular choice in contemporary deep learning due to its strong empirical performance. However we observe that in privacy sensitive scenarios, the traditional use of Differential Privacy (DP) with the Adam optimizer leads to sub-optimal performance on several tasks. We find that this performance degradation is due to a DP bias in Adam's second moment estimator, introduced by the addition of independent noise in the gradient computation to enforce DP guarantees. This DP bias leads to a different scaling for low variance parameter updates, that is inconsistent with the behavior of non-private Adam, and Adam's sign descent interpretation. We propose the DP-AdamBC optimization algorithm, which corrects for the bias in the second moment estimation and retrieves the expected behaviour of Adam. Empirically, DP-AdamBC significantly improves the optimization performance of DP-Adam by up to 3.5% in final accuracy in image, text, and graph node classification tasks. Qiaoyue Tang, Frederick Shpilevskiy, Mathias Lécuyer |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without RetrainingabstractWe present PANORAMIA, a privacy leakage measurement framework for machine learning models that relies on membership inference attacks using generated data as non-members. By relying on generated non-member data, PANORAMIA eliminates the common dependency of privacy measurement tools on in-distribution non-member data. As a result, PANORAMIA does not modify the model, training data, or training process, and only requires access to a subset of the training data. We evaluate PANORAMIA on ML models for image and tabular data classification, as well as on large-scale language models. Mishaal Kazmi, Hadrien Lautraite, Alireza Akbari, Qiaoyue Tang, Mauricio Soroco, Sébastien Gambs, Mathias Lécuyer |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Triplet Convolutional Networks for Classifying Mixed-Type WBM Patterns with Noisy LabelsabstractWafer Bin Maps (WBM) frequently show various spatial failure patterns that provide crucial information for engineers to identify the root cause of failures and their consequent low yield. To shorten the root-cause diagnosis process, it is important to classify different failure patterns with high accuracy, especially when there is mixed type of failure patterns on the same wafer. The main challenges of mixed type classification in WBMs include: 1) Lack of accurately annotated real-world training dataset, 2) Imbalanced/long-tail distributions among classes, 3) Synthesized training data usually cannot reflect the practical application conditions. In this paper, we propose a weakly supervised learning approach and use an ensemble method based on triplet CNN models to classify mixed-type failure patterns in WBMs. We train the models based on the public WM-811K dataset, which is collected from real products but with only single-label annotations. We demonstrate that such models could mitigate the imbalanced class distribution and being able to learn efficiently from a weakly labeled dataset and achieve superior performances on the classification of real wafer maps with long-tail distributed mixed type failures. We also discuss the practical considerations of implementing such models and the advantages of using triplet over binary CNN models. Chenwei Liu, Qiaoyue Tang |
ITC | 2 |