Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Qiaoyue Tang

dblp:307/3873 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 81% Security and privacy of machine learning · 19%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam
0.812024
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization
0.812024
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization
0.812024
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.812024
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.812024
PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retraining · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing
0.812024
PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retraining · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD
0.212024
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction) · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

second moment estimation · 1.5bias correction · 1.5membership inference attack · 0.8generated non-member data · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction)
abstract
The Adam optimizer is a popular choice in contemporary deep learning due to its strong empirical performance. However we observe that in privacy sensitive scenarios, the traditional use of Differential Privacy (DP) with the Adam optimizer leads to sub-optimal performance on several tasks. We find that this performance degradation is due to a DP bias in Adam's second moment estimator, introduced by the addition of independent noise in the gradient computation to enforce DP guarantees. This DP bias leads to a different scaling for low variance parameter updates, that is inconsistent with the behavior of non-private Adam, and Adam's sign descent interpretation. We propose the DP-AdamBC optimization algorithm, which corrects for the bias in the second moment estimation and retrieves the expected behaviour of Adam. Empirically, DP-AdamBC significantly improves the optimization performance of DP-Adam by up to 3.5% in final accuracy in image, text, and graph node classification tasks.
Qiaoyue Tang, Frederick Shpilevskiy, Mathias Lécuyer
AAAI1
2024 PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retraining
abstract
We present PANORAMIA, a privacy leakage measurement framework for machine learning models that relies on membership inference attacks using generated data as non-members. By relying on generated non-member data, PANORAMIA eliminates the common dependency of privacy measurement tools on in-distribution non-member data. As a result, PANORAMIA does not modify the model, training data, or training process, and only requires access to a subset of the training data. We evaluate PANORAMIA on ML models for image and tabular data classification, as well as on large-scale language models.
Mishaal Kazmi, Hadrien Lautraite, Alireza Akbari, Qiaoyue Tang, Mauricio Soroco, Sébastien Gambs, Mathias Lécuyer
NeurIPS4
2021 Triplet Convolutional Networks for Classifying Mixed-Type WBM Patterns with Noisy Labels
abstract
Wafer Bin Maps (WBM) frequently show various spatial failure patterns that provide crucial information for engineers to identify the root cause of failures and their consequent low yield. To shorten the root-cause diagnosis process, it is important to classify different failure patterns with high accuracy, especially when there is mixed type of failure patterns on the same wafer. The main challenges of mixed type classification in WBMs include: 1) Lack of accurately annotated real-world training dataset, 2) Imbalanced/long-tail distributions among classes, 3) Synthesized training data usually cannot reflect the practical application conditions. In this paper, we propose a weakly supervised learning approach and use an ensemble method based on triplet CNN models to classify mixed-type failure patterns in WBMs. We train the models based on the public WM-811K dataset, which is collected from real products but with only single-label annotations. We demonstrate that such models could mitigate the imbalanced class distribution and being able to learn efficiently from a weakly labeled dataset and achieve superior performances on the classification of real wafer maps with long-tail distributed mixed type failures. We also discuss the practical considerations of implementing such models and the advantages of using triplet over binary CNN models.
Chenwei Liu, Qiaoyue Tang
ITC2