EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishi Gondkar
dblp:307/5966
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 88% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › social navigation
socially-aware path planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
social navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Human-robot interaction › robot navigation
human-aware navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Human-robot interaction › robot navigation
social robot navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › agent planning
action planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE framework · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
software agents · 1.0cognitive architecture · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Towards efficient human-robot cooperation for socially-aware robot navigation in human-populated environments: the SNAPE frameworkabstractIt is widely accepted that in the future, robots will cooperate with humans in everyday tasks. Robots interacting with humans will require social awareness when performing their tasks which will require navigation. While navigating, robots should aim to avoid distressing people in order to maximize their chance of social acceptance. For instance, avoiding getting too close to people or disrupting interactions. Most research approaches these problems by planning socially accepted paths, however, in everyday situations, there are many examples where a simple path planner cannot solve all of the predicted robots’ navigation problems. For instance, requesting permission to interrupt a conversation if an alternative path cannot be determined requires deliberative skills. This article presents the Social Navigation framework for Autonomous robots in Populated Environments (SNAPE), where different software agents are integrated within a robotics cognitive architecture. SNAPE addresses action planning aimed at social-awareness navigation in realistic situations: it plans socially accepted paths and conversations to negotiate its trajectory to reach targets. In this article, the framework is evaluated in different use-cases where the robot, during its navigation, has to interact with different people in order to reach its goal. The results show that participants report that the robot’s behavior was realistic and human-like. Araceli Vega-Magro, Rishi Gondkar, Luis Manso, Pedro Núñez Trujillo |
ICRA | 2 |