Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Louis-Sébastien Rebuffi

dblp:307/9767 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-5953-6231ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
autoscaling
0.912025
Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.912025
Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing
0.912025
Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.612022
Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State Space · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
undiscounted reinforcement learning
0.612022
Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State Space · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes
0.612022
Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State Space · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.312025
Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2025
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.312025
Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov chain mixing time · 1.7kiefer-wolfowitz stochastic approximation · 1.7regret analysis · 1.1UCRL2 · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platforms
abstract
To efficiently manage serverless computing platforms, a key aspect is the auto-scaling of services, i.e., the set of computational resources allocated to a service adapts over time as a function of the traffic demand. The objective is to find a compromise between user-perceived performance and energy consumption. In this paper, we consider the scale-per-request auto-scaling pattern and investigate how many function instances (or servers) should be spawned each time an unfortunate job arrives, i.e., a job that finds all servers busy upon its arrival. We address this problem by following a stochastic optimization approach: we develop a stochastic gradient descent scheme of the Kiefer-Wolfowitz type that applies over a single run of the state evolution. At each iteration, the proposed scheme computes an estimate of the number of servers to spawn each time an unfortunate job arrives to minimize some cost function. Under natural assumptions, we show that the sequence of estimates produced by our scheme is asymptotically optimal almost surely. In addition, we prove that its convergence rate is$O(n^{-2/3})$where n is the number of iterations. From a mathematical point of view, the stochastic optimization framework induced by auto-scaling exhibits non-standard aspects that we approach from a general point of view. We consider the setting where a controller can only get samples of the transient – rather than stationary – behavior of the underlying stochastic system. To handle this difficulty, we develop arguments that exploit properties of the mixing time of the underlying Markov chain. By means of numerical simulations, we validate the proposed approach and quantify its gain with respect to common existing scale-up rules.
Jonatha Anselmi, Bruno Gaujal, Louis-Sébastien Rebuffi
IEEE Trans. Netw.3
2022 Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State Space
abstract
In this paper, we revisit the regret of undiscounted reinforcement learning in MDPs with a birth and death structure. Specifically, we consider a controlled queue with impatient jobs and the main objective is to optimize a trade-off between energy consumption and user-perceived performance. Within this setting, the diameter $D$ of the MDP is $\Omega(S^S)$, where $S$ is the number of states. Therefore, the existing lower and upper bounds on the regret at time $T$, of order $O (\sqrt{DSAT})$ for MDPs with $S$ states and $A$ actions, may suggest that reinforcement learning is inefficient here. In our main result however, we exploit the structure of our MDPs to show that the regret of a slightly-tweaked version of the classical learning algorithm UCRL2 is in fact upper bounded by $\tilde{\mathcal{O}} (\sqrt{E_2AT})$ where $E_2$ is a weighted second moment of the stationary measure of a reference policy. Importantly, $E_2$ is bounded independently of $S$. Thus, our bound is asymptotically independent of the number of states and of the diameter. This result is based on a careful study of the number of visits performed by the learning algorithm to the states of the MDP, which is highly non-uniform.
Jonatha Anselmi, Bruno Gaujal, Louis-Sébastien Rebuffi
NeurIPS3
2021 Optimal speed profile of a DVFS processor under soft deadlines
Jonatha Anselmi, Bruno Gaujal, Louis-Sébastien Rebuffi
Perform. Evaluation3