Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Tanner Norton

dblp:308/2500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security
email security		 0.512021
Measuring email sender validation in the wild · CoNEXT 2021
Network security › protocol security
source authentication		 0.512021
Measuring email sender validation in the wild · CoNEXT 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large-scale measurement · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Measuring email sender validation in the wild
abstract
Email is a critical Internet application, and its security is important. The Sender Policy Framework (SPF), DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) were developed to enable mail servers to detect and reject email coming from fraudulent sources. In this paper we study the state of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation across a large number of mail servers, the first such study at scale that we know of. We consider two behaviors of sender-validating mail servers: behavior when an email with a valid sender is received and behavior when an email from a invalid sender is received. Our techniques allow us to elicit SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation behavior of the servers without spam. We find that as many as 85% of mail servers are deploying SPF validation, and over half are deploying all three mechanisms: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. We also observe there are some nuanced behaviors with regard to adherence to the SPF specification.
Casey T. Deccio, Tarun Kumar Yadav, Nathaniel Bennett, Alden Hilton, Michael Howe, Tanner Norton, Jacob Rohde, Eunice Tan, Bradley Taylor
 CoNEXT6