Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sepehr Abdous

dblp:308/2787 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4443-3863ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Network measurement and analytics · 31% Datacenter networks · 25% Transport protocols and congestion control · 24%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Datacenter networks
load balancing
0.912025
Uno: A One-Stop Solution for Inter- and Intra-Data Center Congestion Control and Reliable Connectivity · SC 2025
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation › fair resource allocation
rate fairness
0.912025
Uno: A One-Stop Solution for Inter- and Intra-Data Center Congestion Control and Reliable Connectivity · SC 2025
Network measurement and analytics › traffic characterization
bursty traffic
0.712023
Understanding the impact of host networking elements on traffic bursts · NSDI 2023
Network measurement and analytics
traffic analysis
0.712023
Understanding the impact of host networking elements on traffic bursts · NSDI 2023
Transport protocols and congestion control
congestion management
0.512021
Burst-tolerant datacenter networks with Vertigo · CoNEXT 2021
Transport protocols and congestion control
packet reordering
0.512021
Burst-tolerant datacenter networks with Vertigo · CoNEXT 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
datacenter communication
0.312025
Uno: A One-Stop Solution for Inter- and Intra-Data Center Congestion Control and Reliable Connectivity · SC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

erasure coding · 1.7adaptive routing · 1.7selective deflection · 0.5flow size tracking · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 One to Many: Closing the Bandwidth Gap in AI Datacenters with Scalable Multicast
abstract
AI training now floods datacenter fabrics with thousands of simultaneous collectives, yet most frameworks still move data the hard way: O(N) unicasts for a group of N processors. Classic multicast could slash those bytes but has long been deemed unscalable: computing an optimal tree in an asymmetric Clos is NP-hard and group-specific rules quickly exhaust switch TCAM.
Sepehr Abdous, Jinqi Lu, Jiacheng Wan, Erfan Sharafzadeh, Ying Zhang 0022, Soudeh Ghorbani
HotNets1
2025 Uno: A One-Stop Solution for Inter- and Intra-Data Center Congestion Control and Reliable Connectivity
abstract
Cloud computing and AI workloads are driving unprecedented demand for efficient communication within and across datacenters. However, the coexistence of intra- and inter-datacenter traffic within datacenters plus the disparity between the RTTs of intra- and inter-datacenter networks complicates congestion management and traffic routing. Particularly, faster congestion responses of intra-datacenter traffic causes rate unfairness when competing with slower inter-datacenter flows. Additionally, inter-datacenter messages suffer from slow loss recovery and, thus, require reliability. Existing solutions overlook these challenges and handle inter- and intra-datacenter congestion with separate control loops or at different granularities. We propose Uno, a unified system for both inter- and intra-DC environments that integrates a transport protocol for rapid congestion reaction and fair rate control with a load balancing scheme that combines erasure coding and adaptive routing. Our findings show that Uno significantly improves the completion times of both inter- and intra-DC flows compared to state-of-the-art methods such as Gemini.
Tommaso Bonato, Sepehr Abdous, Abdul Kabbani, Ahmad Ghalayini, Nadeen Gebara, Terry Lam, Anup Agarwal, Tiancheng Chen, Zhuolong Yu, Konstantin Taranov, Mahmoud Elhaddad, Daniele De Sensi, Soudeh Ghorbani, Torsten Hoefler
SC2
2023 Understanding the impact of host networking elements on traffic bursts
Erfan Sharafzadeh, Sepehr Abdous, Soudeh Ghorbani
NSDI2
2021 Burst-tolerant datacenter networks with Vertigo
abstract
Microsecond-scale congestion events, known as microbursts, are a main cause of packet loss and poor application performance in today's datacenters. Given the low network utilization in datacenters, one would expect packet deflection, in-situ re-routing of packets that arrive at a full buffer to a different port, to effectively prevent packet loss. However, if deployed naively, deflection leads to excessive packet re-ordering, exacerbated congestion, and head-of-the-line blocking in switch buffers. In this study, we resolve the above challenges by selectively deflecting the packets that cause persistent congestion in the network. To enable this, we augment the end-host network stacks with a transport-independent extension that tracks and marks flows with their remaining bytes. Our in-network deflection component uses the flow size information to re-route packets from flows with more data to send. Finally, an extension to the receive-side of end-host stacks retrieves the correct ordering of packets before passing them to transport and higherlevel protocols. We evaluate our design, Vertigo, under diverse datacenter workloads and show that it is effective in managing microbursts under light and heavy loads and when combined with various congestion control algorithms. For example, in a leaf-spine network under 85% load, Vertigo reduces the mean incast query completion times by 3.5x, 3.3x, 5x compared to ECMP, DRILL, and DIBS when using TCP, 3x, 3.5x, 4.5x alongside DCTCP, and 43x, 33x, 16x when using Swift, respectively.
Sepehr Abdous, Erfan Sharafzadeh, Soudeh Ghorbani
CoNEXT1