EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Allison C. Tam
dblp:308/6267
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 40% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Generative modeling · 15% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
mode collapse mitigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Edge of Orthogonality: A Simple View of What Makes BYOL Tick · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
language-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal representation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
novelty-based exploration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pre-trained representations |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stop-gradient · 0.7linear algebra · 0.7exponential moving average · 0.7vision-language pretraining · 0.6on-policy RL · 0.6off-policy RL · 0.6language prediction · 0.6explanation training · 0.6deep reinforcement learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The Edge of Orthogonality: A Simple View of What Makes BYOL TickabstractSelf-predictive unsupervised learning methods such as BYOL or SimSIAM have shown impressive results, and counter-intuitively, do not collapse to trivial representations. In this work, we aim at exploring the simplest possible mathematical arguments towards explaining the underlying mechanisms behind self-predictive unsupervised learning. We start with the observation that those methods crucially rely on the presence of a predictor network (and stop-gradient). With simple linear algebra, we show that when using a linear predictor, the optimal predictor is close to an orthogonal projection, and propose a general framework based on orthonormalization that enables to interpret and give intuition on why BYOL works. In addition, this framework demonstrates the crucial role of the exponential moving average and stop-gradient operator in BYOL as an efficient orthonormalization mechanism. We use these insights to propose four new closed-form predictor variants of BYOL to support our analysis. Our closed-form predictors outperform standard linear trainable predictor BYOL at 100 and 300 epochs (top-1 linear accuracy on ImageNet). Pierre H. Richemond, Allison C. Tam, Yunhao Tang, Florian Strub, Bilal Piot, Felix Hill |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureabstractInferring the abstract relational and causal structure of the world is a major challenge for reinforcement-learning (RL) agents. For humans, language{—}particularly in the form of explanations{—}plays a considerable role in overcoming this challenge. Here, we show that language can play a similar role for deep RL agents in complex environments. While agents typically struggle to acquire relational and causal knowledge, augmenting their experience by training them to predict language descriptions and explanations can overcome these limitations. We show that language can help agents learn challenging relational tasks, and examine which aspects of language contribute to its benefits. We then show that explanations can help agents to infer not only relational but also causal structure. Language can shape the way that agents to generalize out-of-distribution from ambiguous, causally-confounded training, and explanations even allow agents to learn to perform experimental interventions to identify causal relationships. Our results suggest that language description and explanation may be powerful tools for improving agent learning and generalization. Andrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta 0001, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Allison C. Tam, James L. McClelland, Adam Santoro, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Jane X. Wang, Felix Hill |
ICML | 5 |
| 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained RepresentationsabstractEffective exploration is a challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). Novelty-based exploration methods can suffer in high-dimensional state spaces, such as continuous partially-observable 3D environments. We address this challenge by defining novelty using semantically meaningful state abstractions, which can be found in learned representations shaped by natural language. In particular, we evaluate vision-language representations, pretrained on natural image captioning datasets. We show that these pretrained representations drive meaningful, task-relevant exploration and improve performance on 3D simulated environments. We also characterize why and how language provides useful abstractions for exploration by considering the impacts of using representations from a pretrained model, a language oracle, and several ablations. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach with on- and off-policy RL algorithms and in two very different task domains---one that stresses the identification and manipulation of everyday objects, and one that requires navigational exploration in an expansive world. Our results suggest that using language-shaped representations could improve exploration for various algorithms and agents in challenging environments. Allison C. Tam, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Andrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, DJ Strouse, Jane X. Wang, Andrea Banino, Felix Hill |
NeurIPS | 1 |