Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Irianna Torres
dblp:308/6632
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › tumor evolution
clonal evolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
somatic copy number alteration detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phylogenetic inference · 0.5integer linear programming · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) dataabstractMOTIVATION: Computational reconstruction of clonal evolution in cancers has become a crucial tool for understanding how tumors initiate and progress and how this process varies across patients. The field still struggles, however, with special challenges of applying phylogenetic methods to cancers, such as the prevalence and importance of copy number alteration (CNA) and structural variation events in tumor evolution, which are difficult to profile accurately by prevailing sequencing methods in such a way that subsequent reconstruction by phylogenetic inference algorithms is accurate. RESULTS: In this work, we develop computational methods to combine sequencing with multiplex interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization to exploit the complementary advantages of each technology in inferring accurate models of clonal CNA evolution accounting for both focal changes and aneuploidy at whole-genome scales. By integrating such information in an integer linear programming framework, we demonstrate on simulated data that incorporation of FISH data substantially improves accurate inference of focal CNA and ploidy changes in clonal evolution from deconvolving bulk sequence data. Analysis of real glioblastoma data for which FISH, bulk sequence and single cell sequence are all available confirms the power of FISH to enhance accurate reconstruction of clonal copy number evolution in conjunction with bulk and optionally single-cell sequence data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is available on Github at https://github.com/CMUSchwartzLab/FISH_deconvolution. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Haoyun Lei, E. Michael Gertz, Alejandro A. Schäffer, Xuecong Fu, Yifeng Tao, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad, Irianna Torres, Guibo Li, Liqin Xu, Yong Hou, Kui Wu 0005, Xulian Shi, Mike Dean, Thomas Ried, Russell Schwartz |
Bioinform. | 7 |