Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yougang Lyu
dblp:308/6883
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-1082-9267ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 32% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › LLM-based multi-agent systems
multi-agent LLM coordination |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition · WWW 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition · WWW 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › named entity recognition
zero-shot named entity recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition · WWW 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model fine-tuning
knowledge-aware fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › robust contrastive learning
debiased contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge injection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-annotated demonstration · 0.9multi-agent learning · 0.9large language model · 0.9contrastive preference optimization · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8positive sampling · 0.7negative sampling · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference OptimizationabstractAs large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing and achieving near-human capabilities on specific tasks, aligning them with human values is becoming more urgent. In scenarios where LLMs outperform humans, we face a weak-to-strong alignment problem where we need to effectively align strong student LLMs through weak supervision generated by weak teachers. Existing alignment methods mainly focus on strong-to-weak alignment and self-alignment settings, and it is impractical to adapt them to the much harder weak-to-strong alignment setting. To fill this gap, we propose a multi-agent contrastive preference optimization (MACPO) framework. MACPO facilitates weak teachers and strong students to learn from each other by iteratively reinforcing unfamiliar positive behaviors while penalizing familiar negative ones. To get this, we devise a mutual positive behavior augmentation strategy to encourage weak teachers and strong students to learn from each other's positive behavior and further provide higher quality positive behavior for the next iteration. Additionally, we propose a hard negative behavior construction strategy to induce weak teachers and strong students to generate familiar negative behavior by fine-tuning on negative behavioral data. Experimental results on the HH-RLHF and PKU-SafeRLHF datasets, evaluated using both automatic metrics and human judgments, demonstrate that MACPO simultaneously improves the alignment performance of strong students and weak teachers. Moreover, as the number of weak teachers increases, MACPO achieves better weak-to-strong alignment performance through more iteration optimization rounds. Yougang Lyu, Lingyong Yan, Zihan Wang 0002, Dawei Yin 0001, Pengjie Ren, Maarten de Rijke, Zhaochun Ren |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity RecognitionabstractZero-shot named entity recognition (NER) aims to develop entity recognition systems from unannotated text corpora. This task presents substantial challenges due to minimal human intervention. Recent work has adapted large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot NER by crafting specialized prompt templates. And it advances models' self-learning abilities by incorporating self-annotated demonstrations. Two important challenges persist: (i) Correlations between contexts surrounding entities are overlooked, leading to wrong type predictions or entity omissions. (ii) The indiscriminate use of task demonstrations, retrieved through shallow similarity-based strategies, severely misleads LLMs during inference. Zihan Wang 0002, Yougang Lyu, Zhumin Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Zhaochun Ren |
WWW | 3 |
| 2024 | KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language ModelsabstractYougang Lyu, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Zhaochun Ren. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Yougang Lyu, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin 0001, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Zhaochun Ren |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Towards Empathetic Conversational Recommender SystemsabstractConversational recommender systems (CRSs) are able to elicit user preferences through multi-turn dialogues. They typically incorporate external knowledge and pre-trained language models to capture the dialogue context. Most CRS approaches, trained on benchmark datasets, assume that the standard items and responses in these benchmarks are optimal. However, they overlook that users may express negative emotions with the standard items and may not feel emotionally engaged by the standard responses. This issue leads to a tendency to replicate the logic of recommenders in the dataset instead of aligning with user needs. To remedy this misalignment, we introduce empathy within a CRS. With empathy we refer to a system’s ability to capture and express emotions. We propose an empathetic conversational recommender (ECR) framework. Ruobing Xie, Yougang Lyu, Xin Xin 0003, Pengjie Ren, Mingfei Liang, Bo Zhang 0056, Zhanhui Kang, Maarten de Rijke, Zhaochun Ren |
RecSys | 3 |
| 2023 | Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language UnderstandingabstractNatural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases rather than intended task-relevant features to achieve high performance on specific datasets. As a result, these models perform poorly on datasets outside the training distribution. Some recent studies address this issue by reducing the weights of biased samples during the training process. However, these methods still encode biased latent features in representations and neglect the dynamic nature of bias, which hinders model prediction. We propose an NLU debiasing method, named debiasing contrastive learning (DCT), to simultaneously alleviate the above problems based on contrastive learning. We devise a debiasing, positive sampling strategy to mitigate biased latent features by selecting the least similar biased positive samples. We also propose a dynamic negative sampling strategy to capture the dynamic influence of biases by employing a bias-only model to dynamically select the most similar biased negative samples. We conduct experiments on three NLU benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance. We also verify that DCT can reduce biased latent features from the model's representation. Yougang Lyu, Piji Li, Yechang Yang, Maarten de Rijke, Pengjie Ren, Yukun Zhao, Dawei Yin 0001, Zhaochun Ren |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Improving legal judgment prediction through reinforced criminal element extraction
Yougang Lyu, Zihan Wang 0002, Zhaochun Ren, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Xiaozhong Liu 0001, Hongsong Li, Hongye Song |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 1 |