Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kevin Kögler
dblp:308/7022
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Learning theory · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth · ICML 2024 Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
landscape analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › message passing
approximate message passing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message Passing · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
generalized linear model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message Passing · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
high-dimensional estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message Passing · ICML 2022 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › approximate message passing
state evolution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message Passing · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
approximate message passing · 1.9state evolution analysis · 1.1gradient descent analysis · 0.8population risk analysis · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and DepthabstractAutoencoders are a prominent model in many empirical branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, basic theoretical questions remain unanswered even in a shallow two-layer setting. In particular, to what degree does a shallow autoencoder capture the structure of the underlying data distribution? For the prototypical case of the 1-bit compression of *sparse* Gaussian data, we prove that gradient descent converges to a solution that completely disregards the sparse structure of the input. Namely, the performance of the algorithm is the same as if it was compressing a Gaussian source -- with no sparsity. For general data distributions, we give evidence of a phase transition phenomenon in the shape of the gradient descent minimizer, as a function of the data sparsity: below the critical sparsity level, the minimizer is a rotation taken uniformly at random (just like in the compression of non-sparse data); above the critical sparsity, the minimizer is the identity (up to a permutation). Finally, by exploiting a connection with approximate message passing algorithms, we show how to improve upon Gaussian performance for the compression of sparse data: adding a denoising function to a shallow architecture already reduces the loss provably, and a suitable multi-layer decoder leads to a further improvement. We validate our findings on image datasets, such as CIFAR-10 and MNIST. Kevin Kögler, Aleksandr Shevchenko, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient MethodsabstractAutoencoders are a popular model in many branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, their fundamental limits, the performance of gradient methods and the features learnt during optimization remain poorly understood, even in the two-layer setting. In fact, earlier work has considered either linear autoencoders or specific training regimes (leading to vanishing or diverging compression rates). Our paper addresses this gap by focusing on non-linear two-layer autoencoders trained in the challenging proportional regime in which the input dimension scales linearly with the size of the representation. Our results characterize the minimizers of the population risk, and show that such minimizers are achieved by gradient methods; their structure is also unveiled, thus leading to a concise description of the features obtained via training. For the special case of a sign activation function, our analysis establishes the fundamental limits for the lossy compression of Gaussian sources via (shallow) autoencoders. Finally, while the results are proved for Gaussian data, numerical simulations on standard datasets display the universality of the theoretical predictions. Aleksandr Shevchenko, Kevin Kögler, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message PassingabstractWe consider the problem of signal estimation in generalized linear models defined via rotationally invariant design matrices. Since these matrices can have an arbitrary spectral distribution, this model is well suited for capturing complex correlation structures which often arise in applications. We propose a novel family of approximate message passing (AMP) algorithms for signal estimation, and rigorously characterize their performance in the high-dimensional limit via a state evolution recursion. Our rotationally invariant AMP has complexity of the same order as the existing AMP derived under the restrictive assumption of a Gaussian design; our algorithm also recovers this existing AMP as a special case. Numerical results showcase a performance close to Vector AMP (which is conjectured to be Bayes-optimal in some settings), but obtained with a much lower complexity, as the proposed algorithm does not require a computationally expensive singular value decomposition. Ramji Venkataramanan, Kevin Kögler, Marco Mondelli |
ICML | 2 |