Vinayak M. Kumar

dblp:308/9739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-7309-5648ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Relaxed vs. Full Local Decodability with Few Queries: Equivalence and Separations for Linear Codes
Elena Grigorescu, Vinayak M. Kumar, Peter Manohar, Geoffrey Mon
STOC2
2025 New Pseudorandom Generators and Correlation Bounds Using Extractors
Vinayak M. Kumar
ITCS1
2025 Linear Hashing Is Optimal
Michael Jaber, Vinayak M. Kumar, David Zuckerman
STOC2
2024 Relaxed Local Correctability from Local Testing
abstract
We construct the first asymptotically good relaxed locally correctable codes with polylogarithmic query complexity, bringing the upper bound polynomially close to the lower bound of Gur and Lachish (SICOMP 2021). Our result follows from showing that a high-rate locally testable code can boost the block length of a smaller relaxed locally correctable code, while preserving the correcting radius and incurring only a modest additive cost in rate and query complexity. We use the locally testable code's tester to check if the amount of corruption in the input is low; if so, we can “zoom-in” to a suitable substring of the input and recurse on the smaller code’s local corrector. Hence, iterating this operation with a suitable family of locally testable codes due to Dinur, Evra, Livne, Lubotzky, and Mozes (STOC 2022) yields asymptotically good codes with relaxed local correctability, arbitrarily large block length, and polylogarithmic query complexity.
Vinayak M. Kumar, Geoffrey Mon
STOC1
2023 Tight Correlation Bounds for Circuits Between AC0 and TC0
Vinayak M. Kumar
CCC1
2021 Pseudobinomiality of the Sticky Random Walk
abstract
Consider an expander graph in which a $μ$ fraction of the vertices are marked. A random walk starts at a uniform vertex and at each step continues to a random neighbor. Gillman showed in 1993 that the number of marked vertices seen in a random walk of length $n$ is concentrated around its expectation, $Φ:= μn$, independent of the size of the graph. Here we provide a new and sharp tail bound, improving on the existing bounds whenever $μ$ is not too large.
Venkatesan Guruswami, Vinayak M. Kumar
ITCS2
2021 Condition number bounds for causal inference
abstract
An important achievement in the field of causal inference was a complete characterization of when a causal effect, in a system modeled by a causal graph, can be determined uniquely from purely observational data. The identification algorithms resulting from this work produce exact symbolic expressions for causal effects, in terms of the observational probabilities. More recent work has looked at the numerical properties of these expressions, in particular using the classical notion of the condition number. In its classical interpretation, the condition number quantifies the sensitivity of the output values of the expressions to small numerical perturbations in the input observational probabilities. In the context of causal identification, the condition number has also been shown to be related to the effect of certain kinds of uncertainties in the structure of the causal graphical model. In this paper, we first give an upper bound on the condition number for the interesting case of causal graphical models with small “confounded components”. We then develop a tight characterization of the condition number of any given causal identification problem. Finally, we use our tight characterization to give a specific example where the condition number can be much lower than that obtained via generic bounds on the condition number, and to show that even “equivalent” expressions for causal identification can behave very differently with respect to their numerical stability properties.
Spencer Gordon, Vinayak M. Kumar, Leonard J. Schulman, Piyush Srivastava 0001
UAI2