Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amir-Reza Asadi

dblp:309/2543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3436-3307ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Information theory · 70% Computational complexity · 30%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% Reinforcement learning · 12%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory
hypothesis testing
1.522025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
1.522025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.532024
An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.922025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Information theory › hypothesis testing
binary hypothesis testing
0.912025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Information theory
communication constraints
0.912025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
hierarchical learning
0.812024
An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
uniform convergence
0.812024
An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Privacy and data protection
hypothesis testing
0.712023
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization
0.412020
Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
0.312018
Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.312025
Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension
0.112018
Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimax analysis · 3.1instance-optimal algorithms · 1.7total variation distance · 1.3hellinger divergence · 1.3multiscale analysis · 0.8entropy-based regularization · 0.8mutual information method · 0.7dudley's inequality · 0.7chaining · 0.7multilevel relative entropy · 0.4metropolis algorithm · 0.4gibbs posterior · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints
abstract
We study simple binary hypothesis testing under both local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. We qualify our results as either minimax optimal or instance optimal: the former hold for the set of distribution pairs with prescribed Hellinger divergence and total variation distance, whereas the latter hold for specific distribution pairs. For the sample complexity of simple hypothesis testing under pure LDP constraints, we establish instance-optimal bounds for distributions with binary support; minimax-optimal bounds for general distributions; and (approximately) instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms for general distributions. When both privacy and communication constraints are present, we develop instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms that achieve the minimum possible sample complexity (up to universal constants). Our results on instance-optimal algorithms hinge on identifying the extreme points of the joint range set$\mathcal {A}$of two distributionspandq, defined as$\mathcal {A}:= \{(\vec {T} p, \vec {T} q) | \vec {T}\in \mathcal {C}\}$, where$\mathcal {C}$is the set of channels characterizing the constraints.
Ankit Pensia, Amir-Reza Asadi, Varun S. Jog, Po-Ling Loh
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2024 An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning
abstract
Machine learning, the predominant approach in the field of artificial intelligence, enables computers to learn from data and experience. In the supervised learning framework, accurate and efficient learning of dependencies between data instances and their corresponding labels requires auxiliary information about the data distribution and the target function. This central concept aligns with the notion of regularization in statistical learning theory. Real-world datasets are often characterized by multiscale data instance distributions and well-behaved, smooth target functions. Scale-invariant probability distributions, such as power-law distributions, provide notable examples of multiscale data instance distributions in various contexts. This paper introduces a hierarchical learning model that leverages such a multiscale data structure with a multiscale entropy-based training procedure and explores its statistical and computational advantages. The hierarchical learning model is inspired by the logical progression in human learning from easy to complex tasks and features interpretable levels. In this model, the logarithm of any data instance’s norm can be construed as the data instance's complexity, and the allocation of computational resources is tailored to this complexity, resulting in benefits such as increased inference speed. Furthermore, our multiscale analysis of the statistical risk yields stronger guarantees compared to conventional uniform convergence bounds.
Amir-Reza Asadi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2023 Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints
abstract
We study simple binary hypothesis testing under local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. Our results are either minimax optimal or instance optimal: the former hold for the set of distribution pairs with prescribed Hellinger divergence and total variation distance, whereas the latter hold for specific distribution pairs. For the sample complexity of simple hypothesis testing under pure LDP constraints, we establish instance-optimal bounds for distributions with binary support; minimax-optimal bounds for general distributions; and (approximately) instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms for general distributions. Under both privacy and communication constraints, we develop instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms that achieve minimal sample complexity (up to universal constants). Our results on instance-optimal algorithms hinge on identifying the extreme points of the joint range set of two distributions $p$ and $q$, defined as $\mathcal{A} := \{(\mathbf{T} p, \mathbf{T} q) | \mathbf{T} \in \mathcal{C}\}$, where $\mathcal{C}$ is the set of channels characterizing the constraints.
Ankit Pensia, Amir-Reza Asadi, Varun S. Jog, Po-Ling Loh
COLT2
2023 On the Gibbs Exponential Mechanism and Private Synthetic Data Generation
abstract
We study the Gibbs exponential mechanism and its use in generating private synthetic data. We first present bounds on the expected utility of the Gibbs and generalized Gibbs mechanisms based on their privacy parameters. Next, we provide two notions of privacy and functionals of utility with respect to which the Gibbs mechanism is provably optimal among all mechanisms. These rely on a valuable property of Gibbs distributions relating them to relative entropy, called the Gibbs variational principle, and its extension to Rényi divergences and generalized moments. Finally, we study how to use the Gibbs mechanism to generate synthetic data privately. Combining known results in empirical process theory with the privacy-utility tradeoff results of this paper, we derive bounds on the utility of the Gibbs mechanism as a function of the size of the synthetic database.
Amir-Reza Asadi, Po-Ling Loh
ISIT1
2020 Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural Networks
abstract
We derive generalization and excess risk bounds for neural networks using a family of complexity measures based on a multilevel relative entropy. The bounds are obtained by introducing the notion of generated hierarchical coverings of neural networks and by using the technique of chaining mutual information introduced by Asadi et al. '18. The resulting bounds are algorithm-dependent and multiscale: they exploit the multilevel structure of neural networks. This, in turn, leads to an empirical risk minimization problem with a multilevel entropic regularization. The minimization problem is resolved by introducing a multiscale extension of the celebrated Gibbs posterior distribution, proving that the derived distribution achieves the unique minimum. This leads to a new training procedure for neural networks with performance guarantees, which exploits the chain rule of relative entropy rather than the chain rule of derivatives (as in backpropagation), and which takes into account the interactions between different scales of the hypothesis sets of neural networks corresponding to different depths of the hidden layers. To obtain an efficient implementation of the latter, we further develop a multilevel Metropolis algorithm simulating the multiscale Gibbs distribution, with an experiment for a two-layer neural network on the MNIST data set.
Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2018 Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds
abstract
Bounding the generalization error of learning algorithms has a long history, which yet falls short in explaining various generalization successes including those of deep learning. Two important difficulties are (i) exploiting the dependencies between the hypotheses, (ii) exploiting the dependence between the algorithm’s input and output. Progress on the first point was made with the chaining method, originating from the work of Kolmogorov, and used in the VC-dimension bound. More recently, progress on the second point was made with the mutual information method by Russo and Zou ’15. Yet, these two methods are currently disjoint. In this paper, we introduce a technique to combine chaining and mutual information methods, to obtain a generalization bound that is both algorithm-dependent and that exploits the dependencies between the hypotheses. We provide an example in which our bound significantly outperforms both the chaining and the mutual information bounds. As a corollary, we tighten Dudley’s inequality when the learning algorithm chooses its output from a small subset of hypotheses with high probability.
Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe, Sergio Verdú
NeurIPS1
2017 Compressing data on graphs with clusters
abstract
This paper investigates the fundamental limits for compressing data on graphs, exploiting dependencies due to community structures in the graph. The source model, referred to as the data block model (DBM), is a mixture of discrete memoryless sources determined by the community structure of a stochastic block model (SBM). The main result gives the optimal expected length of a lossless compressor when the community signal is strong enough, a condition on the edge probabilities and the data distributions, which can take place below the exact recovery threshold of the SBM. This is derived in part by obtaining the threshold for exact recovery in SBMs with strong side information, a result of independent interest, which extends the CH-divergence threshold. Finally we discuss compressing data with almost exact recovery algorithms.
Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe, Sergio Verdú
ISIT1