Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mehrad Mahmoudian
dblp:309/3930
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-7650-1862ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Stable Iterative Variable Selection · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Stable Iterative Variable Selection · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
omics data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Stable Iterative Variable Selection · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
caret RFE · 0.5boruta · 0.5LASSO regression · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Stable Iterative Variable SelectionabstractMOTIVATION: The emergence of datasets with tens of thousands of features, such as high-throughput omics biomedical data, highlights the importance of reducing the feature space into a distilled subset that can truly capture the signal for research and industry by aiding in finding more effective biomarkers for the question in hand. A good feature set also facilitates building robust predictive models with improved interpretability and convergence of the applied method due to the smaller feature space. RESULTS: Here, we present a robust feature selection method named Stable Iterative Variable Selection (SIVS) and assess its performance over both omics and clinical data types. As a performance assessment metric, we compared the number and goodness of the selected feature using SIVS to those selected by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression. The results suggested that the feature space selected by SIVS was, on average, 41% smaller, without having a negative effect on the model performance. A similar result was observed for comparison with Boruta and caret RFE. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method is implemented as an R package under GNU General Public License v3.0 and is accessible via Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) via https://cran.r-project.org/package=sivs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Mehrad Mahmoudian, Mikko S. Venäläinen, Riku Klén, Laura Elo |
Bioinform. | 1 |