Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qihao He
dblp:309/5288
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 77% Vision and language · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
streaming video understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OVO-Bench: How Far is Your Video-LLMs from Real-World Online Video Understanding? · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | OVO-Bench: How Far is Your Video-LLMs from Real-World Online Video Understanding? · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evaluation pipeline · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | OVO-Bench: How Far is Your Video-LLMs from Real-World Online Video Understanding?abstractTemporal Awareness—the ability to reason dynamically based on the timestamp when a question is raised—is the key distinction between offline and online video LLMs. Unlike offline models, which rely on complete videos for static, post hoc analysis, online models process video streams incrementally and dynamically adapt their responses based on the timestamp at which the question is posed. Despite its significance, temporal awareness has not been adequately evaluated in existing benchmarks. To fill this gap, we present OVO-Bench (Online-VideO-Benchmark), a novel video benchmark that emphasizes the importance of timestamps for advanced online video understanding capability benchmarking. OVO-Bench evaluates the ability of video LLMs to reason and respond to events occurring at specific timestamps under three distinct scenarios: (1) Backward tracing: trace back to past events to answer the question. (2) Real-time understanding: understand and respond to events as they unfold at the current timestamp. (3) Forward active responding: delay the response until sufficient future information becomes available to answer the question accurately. OVO-Bench comprises 12 tasks, featuring 644 unique videos and approximately human-curated 2,800 fine-grained meta-annotations with precise timestamps. We combine automated generation pipelines with human curation. With these high-quality samples, we further developed an evaluation pipeline to systematically query video LLMs along the video timeline. Evaluations of eleven Video-LLMs reveal that, despite advancements on traditional benchmarks, current models struggle with on-line video understanding, showing a significant gap compared to human agents. We hope OVO-Bench will drive progress in video LLMs and inspire future research in online video reasoning. Our benchmark and code can be accessed at https://github.com/JoeLeelyf/OVO-Bench. Junbo Niu, Ziyang Miao, Chunjiang Ge, Yuanhang Zhou, Qihao He, Xiaoyi Dong, Haodong Duan, Shuangrui Ding, Rui Qian 0001, Pan Zhang 0001, Yuhang Zang, Yuhang Cao, Conghui He, Jiaqi Wang 0003 |
CVPR | 6 |