Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Franziska Weeber
dblp:309/5548
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-6447-8671ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
personalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
persona prompting |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt variation analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM PersonalizationabstractPersonalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfair outcomes across groups.Prior work has employed so-called personas, sociodemographic user attributes conveyed to a model, to study bias in LLMs by relying on a single cue to prompt a persona, such as user names or explicit attribute mentions.This disregards LLM sensitivity to prompt variation and the rarity of some cues in real interactions (external validity).We compare six commonly used persona cues across seven open and proprietary LLMs on four writing and advice tasks.While cues are overall highly correlated, they produce substantial variance in responses across personas that can change findings on persona-induced differences and bias.We therefore caution against claims based on single persona cues, especially when they are overly explicit and have low external validity. Franziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner, Sebastian Padó |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | PRSM: A Measure to Evaluate CLIP's Robustness Against Paraphrases
Udo Schlegel, Franziska Weeber, Thomas Seidl 0001 |
MMM (4) | 2 |