Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Bensaïd

dblp:309/5685 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 44% Vision and language · 34% Image recognition and object detection · 17%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
video diffusion model
0.912025
Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
diffusion-based image editing
0.912025
Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing
image editing
0.912025
Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.712023
CLIPTER: Looking at the Bigger Picture in Scene Text Recognition · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text recognition
0.712023
CLIPTER: Looking at the Bigger Picture in Scene Text Recognition · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.712023
CLIPTER: Looking at the Bigger Picture in Scene Text Recognition · ICCV 2023
Visual content generation and editing
video generation
0.312025
Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image-to-video generation · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7gated cross-attention · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7CLIP · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Pathways on the Image Manifold: Image Editing via Video Generation
abstract
Recent advances in image editing, driven by image diffusion models, have shown remarkable progress. However, significant challenges remain, as these models often struggle to follow complex edit instructions accurately and frequently compromise fidelity by altering key elements of the original image. Simultaneously, video generation has made remarkable strides, with models that effectively function as consistent and continuous world simulators. In this paper, we propose merging these two fields by utilizing image-to-video models for image editing. We reformulate image editing as a temporal process, using pretrained video models to create smooth transitions from the original image to the desired edit. This approach traverses the image manifold continuously, ensuring consistent edits while preserving the original image’s key aspects. Our approach achieves stateof-the-art results on text-based image editing, demonstrating significant improvements in both edit accuracy and image preservation. Visit our project page.
Noam Rotstein, Gal Yona, Daniel Silver, Roy Velich, David Bensaïd, Ron Kimmel
CVPR5
2024 FuseCap: Leveraging Large Language Models for Enriched Fused Image Captions
abstract
The advent of vision-language pre-training techniques enhanced substantial progress in the development of models for image captioning. However, these models frequently produce generic captions and may omit semantically important image details. This limitation can be traced back to the image-text datasets; while their captions typically offer a general description of image content, they frequently omit salient details. Considering the magnitude of these datasets, manual reannotation is impractical, emphasizing the need for an automated approach. To address this challenge, we leverage existing captions and explore augmenting them with visual details using "frozen" vision experts including an object detector, an attribute recognizer, and an Optical Character Recognizer (OCR). Our proposed method, FuseCap, fuses the outputs of such vision experts with the original captions using a large language model (LLM), yielding comprehensive image descriptions. We automatically curate a training set of 12M image-enriched caption pairs. These pairs undergo extensive evaluation through both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Subsequently, this data is utilized to train a captioning generation BLIP-based model. This model outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches, producing more precise and detailed descriptions, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data-centric approach. We release this large-scale dataset of enriched image-caption pairs for the community.
Noam Rotstein, David Bensaïd, Shaked Brody, Roy Ganz, Ron Kimmel
WACV2
2023 CLIPTER: Looking at the Bigger Picture in Scene Text Recognition
abstract
Reading text in real-world scenarios often requires understanding the context surrounding it, especially when dealing with poor-quality text. However, current scene text recognizers are unaware of the bigger picture as they operate on cropped text images. In this study, we harness the representative capabilities of modern vision-language models, such as CLIP, to provide scene-level information to the crop-based recognizer. We achieve this by fusing a rich representation of the entire image, obtained from the vision-language model, with the recognizer word-level features via a gated cross-attention mechanism. This component gradually shifts to the context-enhanced representation, allowing for stable fine-tuning of a pretrained recognizer. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model-agnostic framework, CLIPTER (CLIP TExt Recognition), on leading text recognition architectures and achieve state-of-the-art results across multiple benchmarks. Furthermore, our analysis highlights improved robustness to out-of-vocabulary words and enhanced generalization in low-data regimes.
Aviad Aberdam, David Bensaïd, Alona Golts, Roy Ganz, Oren Nuriel, Royee Tichauer, Shai Mazor, Ron Litman
ICCV2
2023 Partial Matching of Nonrigid Shapes by Learning Piecewise Smooth Functions
abstract
Abstract Learning functions defined on non‐flat domains, such as outer surfaces of non‐rigid shapes, is a central task in computer vision and geometry processing. Recent studies have explored the use of neural fields to represent functions like light reflections in volumetric domains and textures on curved surfaces by operating in the embedding space. Here, we choose a different line of thought and introduce a novel formulation of partial shape matching by learning a piecewise smooth function on a surface. Our method begins with pairing sparse landmarks defined on a full shape and its part, using feature similarity. Next, a neural representation is optimized to fit these landmarks, efficiently interpolating between the matched features that act as anchors. This process results in a function that accurately captures the partiality. Unlike previous methods, the proposed neural model of functions is intrinsically defined on the given curved surface, rather than the classical embedding Euclidean space. This representation is shown to be particularly well‐suited for representing piecewise smooth functions. We further extend the proposed framework to the more challenging part‐to‐part setting, where both shapes exhibit missing parts. Comprehensive experiments highlight that the proposed method effectively addresses partiality in shape matching and significantly outperforms leading state‐of‐the‐art methods in challenging benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/davidgip74/Learning-Partiality-with-Implicit-Intrinsic-Functions
David Bensaïd, Noam Rotstein, Nelson Goldenstein, Ron Kimmel
Comput. Graph. Forum1