Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florian Sachse
dblp:309/5758
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource allocation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource sharing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial-time algorithm · 0.6computational complexity analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing in PairsabstractGiven an initial resource allocation, where some agents may envy others or where a different distribution of resources might lead to a higher social welfare, our goal is to improve the allocation without reassigning resources. We consider a sharing concept allowing resources being shared with social network neighbors of the resource owners. More precisely, our model allows agents to form pairs which then may share a limited number of resources. Sharing a resource can come at some costs or loss in utility. To this end, we introduce a formal model that allows a central authority to compute an optimal sharing between neighbors based on an initial allocation. Advocating this point of view, we focus on the most basic scenario where each agent can participate in a bounded number of sharings. We present algorithms for optimizing utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare of allocations and for reducing the number of envious agents. In particular, we examine the computational complexity with respect to several natural parameters. Furthermore, we study cases with restricted social network structures and, among others, devise polynomial-time algorithms in path- and tree-like (hierarchical) social networks. Robert Bredereck, Andrzej Kaczmarczyk 0001, Junjie Luo 0001, Rolf Niedermeier, Florian Sachse |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 5 |
| 2022 | On Improving Resource Allocations by SharingabstractGiven an initial resource allocation, where some agents may envy others or where a different distribution of resources might lead to higher social welfare, our goal is to improve the allocation without reassigning resources. We consider a sharing concept allowing resources being shared with social network neighbors of the resource owners. To this end, we introduce a formal model that allows a central authority to compute an optimal sharing between neighbors based on an initial allocation. Advocating this point of view, we focus on the most basic scenario where a resource may be shared by two neighbors in a social network and each agent can participate in a bounded number of sharings. We present algorithms for optimizing utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare of allocations and for reducing the number of envious agents. In particular, we examine the computational complexity with respect to several natural parameters. Furthermore, we study cases with restricted social network structures and, among others, devise polynomial-time algorithms in path- and tree-like (hierarchical) social networks. Robert Bredereck, Andrzej Kaczmarczyk 0001, Junjie Luo 0001, Rolf Niedermeier, Florian Sachse |
AAAI | 5 |