Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amelia L. Hoyt

dblp:309/5968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1307-2508ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
biomedical data integration
0.712023
Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
identifier mapping
0.712023
Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023
Computational science and engineering
ontology mapping
0.712023
Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

consistency checking · 0.7automated mapping prediction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biomedical identifier resources (such as ontologies, taxonomies, and controlled vocabularies) commonly overlap in scope and contain equivalent entries under different identifiers. Maintaining mappings between these entries is crucial for interoperability and the integration of data and knowledge. However, there are substantial gaps in available mappings motivating their semi-automated curation. RESULTS: Biomappings implements a curation workflow for missing mappings which combines automated prediction with human-in-the-loop curation. It supports multiple prediction approaches and provides a web-based user interface for reviewing predicted mappings for correctness, combined with automated consistency checking. Predicted and curated mappings are made available in public, version-controlled resource files on GitHub. Biomappings currently makes available 9274 curated mappings and 40 691 predicted ones, providing previously missing mappings between widely used identifier resources covering small molecules, cell lines, diseases, and other concepts. We demonstrate the value of Biomappings on case studies involving predicting and curating missing mappings among cancer cell lines as well as small molecules tested in clinical trials. We also present how previously missing mappings curated using Biomappings were contributed back to multiple widely used community ontologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data and code are available under the CC0 and MIT licenses at https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings.
Charles Tapley Hoyt, Amelia L. Hoyt, Benjamin M. Gyori
Bioinform.2