Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amelia L. Hoyt
dblp:309/5968
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1307-2508ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
biomedical data integration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
identifier mapping |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
ontology mapping |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
consistency checking · 0.7automated mapping prediction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with BiomappingsabstractMOTIVATION: Biomedical identifier resources (such as ontologies, taxonomies, and controlled vocabularies) commonly overlap in scope and contain equivalent entries under different identifiers. Maintaining mappings between these entries is crucial for interoperability and the integration of data and knowledge. However, there are substantial gaps in available mappings motivating their semi-automated curation. RESULTS: Biomappings implements a curation workflow for missing mappings which combines automated prediction with human-in-the-loop curation. It supports multiple prediction approaches and provides a web-based user interface for reviewing predicted mappings for correctness, combined with automated consistency checking. Predicted and curated mappings are made available in public, version-controlled resource files on GitHub. Biomappings currently makes available 9274 curated mappings and 40 691 predicted ones, providing previously missing mappings between widely used identifier resources covering small molecules, cell lines, diseases, and other concepts. We demonstrate the value of Biomappings on case studies involving predicting and curating missing mappings among cancer cell lines as well as small molecules tested in clinical trials. We also present how previously missing mappings curated using Biomappings were contributed back to multiple widely used community ontologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data and code are available under the CC0 and MIT licenses at https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings. Charles Tapley Hoyt, Amelia L. Hoyt, Benjamin M. Gyori |
Bioinform. | 2 |