Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zeyao Zhang
dblp:309/5999
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CPRAL: Collaborative Panoptic-Regional Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
active learning for segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CPRAL: Collaborative Panoptic-Regional Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CPRAL: Collaborative Panoptic-Regional Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vote entropy · 0.6regional gaussian attention · 0.6contextual labels extension · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automatic Geometric Quantification and Rupture Risk Evaluation of 3D Intracranial AneurysmsabstractIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose a significant risk due to their potential to rupture, leading to severe clinical outcomes. Accurate quantification of aneurysm morphology and assessment of rupture risk are crucial for timely intervention and treatment. In this study, we present an approach for the geometric quantification of IAs and clinical rupture risk evaluation based on the relationship between these measurements. Our approach includes a comprehensive set of geometric characteristics, such as height, width, neck width, arterial diameter, area, and volume. We applied these measurements to the public IntrA dataset, and to our knowledge, this is the first geometric analysis conducted on this dataset. By integrating these morphological characteristics with expert assessments, we developed a predictive model for IA rupture risk. Our findings reveal a strong correlation between aneurysm depth and rupture risk, with even stronger associations observed for higher-order dimension metrics like surface area and volume. This highlights the critical role of 3D automatic quantification in evaluating rupture risk. This research provides a foundation for further geometric analysis of IAs and offers potential advancements in automated diagnostics and precision medicine. Xudong Ru, Zeyao Zhang, Xingce Wang, Jing-Yi Liu, Yicheng Zhu, Zhongke Wu |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2025 | Topology-Aware Learning of Tubular Manifolds via SE(3)-Equivariant Network on Ball B-Spline CurveabstractTubular-like system shape analysis is quite difficult in geometry and topology, while it is widely used in plants and organs analysis in practice.
However, traditional discrete representations such as voxels and point clouds often require substantial storage and may lead to the loss of fine-grained geometric and topological details.
To address these challenges, we propose SE(3)-BBSCformerGCN, a novel framework for learning shape-aware representations from continuous tubular topological manifolds with equivariance to rotations and translations.
Our approach leverages Ball B-Spline Curve (BBSC)
to define tubular manifolds and its functional space.
We provide a formal mathematical definition and analysis of the resulting manifolds and the BBSC functional space, and incorporate an equivariant mapping that preserves geometric and topological stability.
Compared to the point cloud and voxel based representations,
our manifold-based formulation significantly reduces data complexity while preserving geometric attributes
together with topological features.
We validate our method on the branch classification task for Circle of Willis (CoW) on the TopCoW 2024 dataset and the clinical dataset.
Our method consistently outperforms voxel and point cloud based baselines in terms of classification performance, generalization ability, convergence speed, and robustness to overfitting. Zhongke Wu, Xingce Wang, Zeyao Zhang, Chunhao Zheng |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | CPRAL: Collaborative Panoptic-Regional Active Learning for Semantic SegmentationabstractAcquiring the most representative examples via active learning (AL) can benefit many data-dependent computer vision tasks by minimizing efforts of image-level or pixel-wise annotations. In this paper, we propose a novel Collaborative Panoptic-Regional Active Learning framework (CPRAL) to address the semantic segmentation task. For a small batch of images initially sampled with pixel-wise annotations, we employ panoptic information to initially select unlabeled samples. Considering the class imbalance in the segmentation dataset, we import a Regional Gaussian Attention module (RGA) to achieve semantics-biased selection. The subset is highlighted by vote entropy and then attended by Gaussian kernels to maximize the biased regions. We also propose a Contextual Labels Extension (CLE) to boost regional annotations with contextual attention guidance. With the collaboration of semantics-agnostic panoptic matching and region-biased selection and extension, our CPRAL can strike a balance between labeling efforts and performance and compromise the semantics distribution. We perform extensive experiments on Cityscapes and BDD10K datasets and show that CPRAL outperforms the cutting-edge methods with impressive results and less labeling proportion. Yu Qiao 0001, Jincheng Zhu, Chengjiang Long, Zeyao Zhang, Yuxin Wang 0001, Zhenjun Du, Xin Yang 0011 |
AAAI | 4 |