Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas Perello

dblp:309/6134 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0001-2693-9011ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning
0.612022
On Optimizing Interventions in Shared Autonomy · AAAI 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation › human-robot interaction
shared autonomy
0.612022
On Optimizing Interventions in Shared Autonomy · AAAI 2022
Human-robot interaction
shared control
0.612022
On Optimizing Interventions in Shared Autonomy · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-free reinforcement learning · 1.1constrained reinforcement learning · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning from Discriminatory Training Data
abstract
Supervised learning systems are trained using historical data and, if the data was tainted by discrimination, they may unintentionally learn to discriminate against protected groups. We propose that fair learning methods, despite training on potentially discriminatory datasets, shall perform well on fair test datasets. Such dataset shifts crystallize application scenarios for specific fair learning methods. For instance, the removal of direct discrimination can be represented as a particular dataset shift problem. For this scenario, we propose a learning method that provably minimizes model error on fair datasets, while blindly training on datasets poisoned with direct additive discrimination. The method is compatible with existing legal systems and provides a solution to the widely discussed issue of protected groups’ intersectionality by striking a balance between the protected groups. Technically, the method applies probabilistic interventions, has causal and counterfactual formulations, and is computationally lightweight — it can be used with any supervised learning model to prevent direct and indirect discrimination via proxies while maximizing model accuracy for business necessity.
Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz, Nicholas Perello, Kenta Takatsu
AIES2
2022 On Optimizing Interventions in Shared Autonomy
abstract
Shared autonomy refers to approaches for enabling an autonomous agent to collaborate with a human with the aim of improving human performance. However, besides improving performance, it may often also be beneficial that the agent concurrently accounts for preserving the user’s experience or satisfaction of collaboration. In order to address this additional goal, we examine approaches for improving the user experience by constraining the number of interventions by the autonomous agent. We propose two model-free reinforcement learning methods that can account for both hard and soft constraints on the number of interventions. We show that not only does our method outperform the existing baseline, but also eliminates the need to manually tune a black-box hyperparameter for controlling the level of assistance. We also provide an in-depth analysis of intervention scenarios in order to further illuminate system understanding.
Weihao Tan, David Koleczek, Siddhant Pradhan, Nicholas Perello, Vivek Chettiar, Vishal Rohra, Aaslesha Rajaram, Soundararajan Srinivasan, H. M. Sajjad Hossain, Yash Chandak
AAAI4