The class MIP* of quantum multiprover interactive proof systems with entanglement is much more powerful than its classical counterpart MIP [ 8 , 31 , 32 ]: while MIP = NEXP, the quantum class MIP * is equal to RE, a class including the halting problem. This is because the provers in MIP * can share unbounded quantum entanglement. However, recent works [ 53 , 54 ] have shown that this advantage is significantly reduced if the provers’ shared state contains noise. This article attempts to exactly characterize the effect of noise on the computational power of quantum multiprover interactive proof systems. We investigate the quantum two-prover one-round interactive system MIP * [poly, O (1)], where the verifier sends polynomially many bits to the provers and the provers send back constantly many bits. We show that noise completely destroys the computational advantage given by shared entanglement in this model. Specifically, we show that if the provers are allowed to share arbitrarily many EPR states, where each EPR state is affected by an arbitrarily small constant amount of noise, the resulting complexity class is equivalent to NEXP = MIP. This improves significantly on the previous best-known bound of NEEEXP (nondeterministic triply exponential time) [ 53 ]. We also show that this collapse in power is due to noise, rather than the O (1) answer size, by showing that allowing for noiseless EPR states gives the class the full power of RE = MIP * [poly, poly]. Along the way, we develop two technical tools of independent interest. First, we give a new, deterministic tester for the positivity of an exponentially large matrix, provided that it has a low-degree Fourier decomposition in terms of Pauli matrices. Secondly, we develop a new invariance principle for smooth matrix functions having bounded third-order Fréchet derivatives or which are Lipschitz continuous.

Quantum multiprover interactive proof systems with entanglement MIP* are much more powerful than its classical counterpart MIP (Babai et al. '91, Ji et al. '20): while MIP = NEXP, the quantum class MIP* is equal to RE, a class including the halting problem. This is because the provers in MIP* can share unbounded quantum entanglement. However, recent works of Qin and Yao '21 and '23 have shown that this advantage is significantly reduced if the provers' shared state contains noise. This paper attempts to exactly characterize the effect of noise on the computational power of quantum multiprover interactive proof systems. We investigate the quantum two-prover one-round interactive system MIP*[poly, O(1)], where the verifier sends polynomially many bits to the provers and the provers send back constantly many bits. We show noise completely destroys the computational advantage given by shared entanglement in this model. Specifically, we show that if the provers are allowed to share arbitrarily many noisy EPR states, where each EPR state is affected by an arbitrarily small constant amount of noise, the resulting complexity class is equivalent to NEXP = MIP. This improves significantly on the previous best-known bound of NEEEXP (nondeterministic triply exponential time) by Qin and Yao '21. We also show that this collapse in power is due to the noise, rather than the O(1) answer size, by showing that allowing for noiseless EPR states gives the class the full power of RE = MIP*[poly, poly]. Along the way, we develop two technical tools of independent interest. First, we give a new, deterministic tester for the positivity of an exponentially large matrix, provided it has a low-degree Fourier decomposition in terms of Pauli matrices. Secondly, we develop a new invariance principle for smooth matrix functions having bounded third-order Fréchet derivatives or which are Lipschitz continous.

This paper considers the decidability of fully quantum nonlocal games with noisy maximally entangled states. Fully quantum nonlocal games are a generalization of nonlocal games, where both questions and answers are quantum and the referee performs a binary POVM measurement to decide whether they win the game after receiving the quantum answers from the players. The quantum value of a fully quantum nonlocal game is the supremum of the probability that they win the game, where the supremum is taken over all the possible entangled states shared between the players and all the valid quantum operations performed by the players. The seminal work $\mathrm{MIP}^*=\mathrm{RE}$ implies that it is undecidable to approximate the quantum value of a fully nonlocal game. This still holds even if the players are only allowed to share (arbitrarily many copies of) maximally entangled states. This paper investigates the case that the shared maximally entangled states are noisy. We prove that there is a computable upper bound on the copies of noisy maximally entangled states for the players to win a fully quantum nonlocal game with a probability arbitrarily close to the quantum value. This implies that it is decidable to approximate the quantum values of these games. Hence, the hardness of approximating the quantum value of a fully quantum nonlocal game is not robust against the noise in the shared states. This paper is built on the framework for the decidability of non-interactive simulations of joint distributions and generalizes the analogous result for nonlocal games. We extend the theory of Fourier analysis to the space of super-operators and prove several key results including an invariance principle and a dimension reduction for super-operators. These results are interesting in their own right and are believed to have further applications.

This paper considers a special class of nonlocal games $(G,\psi)$, where $G$ is a two-player one-round game, and $\psi$ is a bipartite state independent of $G$. In the game $(G,\psi)$, the players are allowed to share arbitrarily many copies of $\psi$. The value of the game $(G,\psi)$, denoted by $\omega^*(G,\psi)$, is the supremum of the winning probability that the players can achieve with arbitrarily many copies of preshared states $\psi$. For a noisy maximally entangled state $\psi$, a two-player one-round game $G$ and an arbitrarily small precision $\epsilon>0$, this paper proves an upper bound on the number of copies of $\psi$ for the players to win the game with a probability $\epsilon$ close to $\omega^*(G,\psi)$. A noisy maximally entangled state is a two-qudit state with both marginals being completely mixed states and the maximal correlation being less than $1$. In particular, it includes $(1-\epsilon)|\Psi_m\rangle\langle\Psi_m|+\epsilon\frac{\mathbbm{1}_m}{m}\otimes\frac{\mathbbm{1}_m}{m}$ for $\epsilon>0$, where $|\Psi_m\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{m}}\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}|m,m\rangle$ is an $m$-dimensional maximally entangled state. Hence, it is feasible to approximately compute $\omega^*(G,\psi)$ to an arbitrary precision. Recently, a breakthrough result by Ji et al. showed that it is undecidable to approximate the values of nonlocal games to a constant precision, when the players preshare arbitrarily many copies of perfect maximally entangled states, which implies that $\mathrm{MIP}^*=\mathrm{RE}$. In contrast, our result implies the hardness of approximating nonlocal games collapses when the preshared maximally entangled states are noisy. The paper develops a theory of Fourier analysis on matrix spaces by extending a number of techniques in Boolean analysis and Hermitian analysis to matrix spaces. We establish a series of new techniques, such as a quantum invariance principle and a hypercontractive inequality for random operators, which we believe have further applications. (A corrected version is attached.)