Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chaitanya Sood

dblp:309/6906 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 67% Indexing and storage engines · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › indexing
document indexing
0.612022
Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing · ICDE 2022
Information retrieval
search engines
0.612022
Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing · ICDE 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.212022
Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing · ICDE 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical index · 1.1asynchronous parallel network requests · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing
abstract
Modern data warehouses can scale compute nodes independently of storage. These systems persist their data on cloud storage, which is always available and cost-efficient. Ad-hoc compute nodes then fetch necessary data on-demand from cloud storage. This ability to quickly scale or shrink data systems is highly beneficial if query workloads may change over time. We apply this new architecture to search engines with a focus on optimizing their latencies in cloud environments. However, simply placing existing search engines (e.g., Apache Lucene) on top of cloud storage significantly increases their end-to-end query latencies (i.e., more than 6 seconds on average in one of our studies). This is because their indexes can incur multiple network round-trips due to their hierarchical structure (e.g., skip lists, B-trees, learned indexes). To address this issue, we develop a new statistical index, called IoU Sketch. For lookup, IoU Sketch makes multiple asynchronous network requests in parallel. While IoU Sketch may fetch more bytes than existing indexes, it significantly reduces the index lookup time because parallel requests do not block each other. Based on IoU Sketch, we built an end-to-end search engine called Airphant; we describe how Airphant builds, optimizes, and manages IoU Sketch, and ultimately supports keyword-based querying. In our experiments with four real datasets, Airphant's average end-to-end latencies are between 13 milliseconds and 300 milliseconds, up to 8.97× faster than Apache Lucence and 113.39× faster than Elasticsearch.
Supawit Chockchowwat, Chaitanya Sood, Yongjoo Park
ICDE2