Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nithish Kannen

dblp:309/6938 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 33% Question answering and dialogue systems · 26% Language models and text generation · 17%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
1.622025
Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompt tuning
prompt alignment
0.912025
Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Human-AI interaction › AI agent
proactive agents
0.912025
Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.712023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
temporal question answering
0.712023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.212024
Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction
0.212023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

clarification questions · 1.7belief graph · 1.7VQAScore · 1.7vendi scores · 0.8structured knowledge base · 0.8large language model · 0.8open-domain question answering · 0.7language model · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty
abstract
User prompts for generative AI models are often underspecified, leading to a misalignment between the user intent and models’ understanding. As a result, users commonly have to painstakingly refine their prompts. We study this alignment problem in text-to-image (T2I) generation and propose a prototype for proactive T2I agents equipped with an interface to (1) actively ask clarification questions when uncertain, and (2) present their uncertainty about user intent as an understandable and editable belief graph. We build simple prototypes for such agents and propose a new scalable and automated evaluation approach using two agents, one with a ground truth intent (an image) while the other tries to ask as few questions as possible to align with the ground truth. We experiment over three image-text datasets: ImageInWords (Garg et al., 2024), COCO (Lin et al., 2014) and DesignBench, a benchmark we curated with strong artistic and design elements. Experiments over the three datasets demonstrate the proposed T2I agents’ ability to ask informative questions and elicit crucial information to achieve successful alignment with at least 2 times higher VQAScore (Lin et al., 2024) than the standard T2I generation. Moreover, we conducted human studies and observed that at least 90% of human subjects found these agents and their belief graphs helpful for their T2I workflow, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. Code and DesignBench can be found at https://github.com/google-deepmind/proactive_t2i_agents.
Meera Hahn, Nithish Kannen, Rich Galt, Kartikeya Badola, Been Kim
ICML3
2024 Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models
abstract
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are being increasingly adopted in diverse global communities where they create visual representations of their unique cultures. Current T2I benchmarks primarily focus on faithfulness, aesthetics, and realism of generated images, overlooking the critical dimension of cultural competence. In this work, we introduce a framework to evaluate cultural competence of T2I models along two crucial dimensions: cultural awareness and cultural diversity, and present a scalable approach using a combination of structured knowledge bases and large language models to build a large dataset of cultural artifacts to enable this evaluation. In particular, we apply this approach to build CUBE (CUltural BEnchmark for Text-to-Image models), a first-of-its-kind benchmark to evaluate cultural competence of T2I models. CUBE covers cultural artifacts associated with 8 countries across different geo-cultural regions and along 3 concepts: cuisine, landmarks, and art. CUBE consists of 1) CUBE-1K, a set of high-quality prompts that enable the evaluation of cultural awareness, and 2) CUBE-CSpace, a larger dataset of cultural artifacts that serves as grounding to evaluate cultural diversity. We also introduce cultural diversity as a novel T2I evaluation component, leveraging quality-weighted Vendi score. Our evaluations reveal significant gaps in the cultural awareness of existing models across countries and provide valuable insights into the cultural diversity of T2I outputs for underspecified prompts. Our methodology is extendable to other cultural regions and concepts and can facilitate the development of T2I models that better cater to the global population.
Nithish Kannen, Arif Ahmad, Marco Andreetto, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Utsav Prabhu, Adji B. Dieng, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Shachi Dave
NeurIPS1
2023 Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction
abstract
Temporal question answering (QA) is a special category of complex question answering task that requires reasoning over facts asserting time intervals of events.Previous works have predominately relied on Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) for temporal QA.One of the major challenges faced by these systems is their inability to retrieve all relevant facts due to factors such as incomplete KB and entity/relation linking errors (Patidar et al., 2022).A failure to fetch even a single fact will block KBQA from computing the answer.Such cases of KB incompleteness are even more profound in the temporal context.To address this issue, we explore an interesting direction where a targeted temporal fact extraction technique is used to assist KBQA whenever it fails to retrieve temporal facts from the KB.We model the extraction problem as an open-domain question answering task using offthe-shelf language models.This way, we target to extract from textual resources those facts that failed to get retrieved from the KB.Experimental results on two temporal QA benchmarks show promising ~30% & ~10% relative improvements in answer accuracies without any additional training cost.
Nithish Kannen, Udit Sharma, Sumit Neelam, Dinesh Khandelwal, Shajith Ikbal, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam
EMNLP1