Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maayane Attias

dblp:309/6995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › biomedical text mining
clinical text analysis
0.712023
RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
domain-specific language model
0.712023
RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction
0.712023
RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised pretraining · 0.7language model benchmarking · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations
abstract
The radiology report is the main form of communication between radiologists and other clinicians. Prior work in natural language processing in radiology reports has shown the value of developing methods tailored for individual tasks such as identifying reports with critical results or disease detection. Meanwhile, English and biomedical natural language understanding benchmarks such as the General Language Understanding and Evaluation as well as Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark have motivated the development of models that can be easily adapted to address many tasks in those domains. Here, we characterize the radiology report as a distinct domain and introduce RaLEs, the Radiology Language Evaluations, as a benchmark for natural language understanding and generation in radiology. RaLEs is comprised of seven natural language understanding and generation evaluations including the extraction of anatomical and disease entities and their relations, procedure selection, and report summarization. We characterize the performance of models designed for the general, biomedical, clinical and radiology domains across these tasks. We find that advances in the general and biomedical domains do not necessarily translate to radiology, and that improved models from the general domain can perform comparably to smaller clinical-specific models. The limited performance of existing pre-trained models on RaLEs highlights the opportunity to improve domain-specific self-supervised models for natural language processing in radiology. We propose RaLEs as a benchmark to promote and track the development of such domain-specific radiology language models.
Juanma Zambrano Chaves, Nandita Bhaskhar, Maayane Attias, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Daniel L. Rubin, Andreas M. Loening, Curt Langlotz, Akshay Chaudhari
NeurIPS3